Masculinity - What Makes a Man?

To be clear…
Do you actually belive that all research funded by multi national companies is presented in an ethical and unbiased manner?

Consider pharmaceutical companies…

Lets say pain management medication research?
Are you convinced that research into potential sude effects or contraindications with other drugs is/was thoroughly and ethically researched. Where pharmaceutical companies supplied funding?

Or lets say weight loss drugs?
Or maybe tobacco cessation programmes?
Or maybe psychotropic meds?

All squeaky clean?

1 Like

I know the question is for @Mascot

But in certain instances, where outcome has effect on lives, I expect that third party unbiased research should be government funded.
Still open to corruption, but I think it would be better.

No, I expect the Media to treat it with contempt.

A lot of the time commercial studies are a marketing exercise more a serious attempt to further human knowledge.

2 Likes

Arguing on the internet?

Thats what makes a man :joy:

Fixed to prove how manly I am :rofl:

‘Homer Simpson’ beer bellies could be gone in days if lager louts follow new fad diet

A poll found that just under 33% of adult men in the UK have a ‘paunch’ or ‘beer belly’ - that’s around 9m of the 28m adult males in Britain, but they’ll have to make some sacrifices if they want it gone

The 9m blokes in the UK with beer bellies could have a flat tum in just five days, a new diet promises. All you have to do is avoid fatty foods like bacon, sausages, steak, and chips and instead restrict your calories to 800-a-day, rather than the recommended 2,500.
Among the dishes you are allowed, include smoothies made of celery, cucumber and avocado, scrambled tofu with spinach, cabbage ‘burgers’, sweet and sour sardines, nettle gnocchi, baked pumpkin and cauliflower and quinoa salad.

The regime - called The Fasting Mimicking Diet (FMD) - promises to ‘blast belly fat’, reduce cholesterol and lower blood sugar.

The diet ‘tricks’ the body into thinking it’s fasting, while still allowing you to eat, and was developed by boffin Professor Valter Longo, the director of the Longevity Institute at the University of Southern California.
Those taking part in the diet only need stick to it for five days each month, eating what they like the other days.

Prof Longo said all the foods are ‘plant-based, low protein and low sugar’, saying they ‘tip the body into fasting mode’ - called autophagy - which uses up existing fat supplies, especially around the tum. He said that the diet ‘attacks abdominal fat without affecting lean muscle’, adding: “On average you lose 5-6lbs of weight, mostly fat.

“FMD can be excellent to control weight, especially because it does not require unwanted changes in the everyday diet, and it can be done when the person is ready to do it.”

I’d rather keep my beer gut, thanks.

2 Likes

And then the belly comes back with a vengeance once the person reverts back to old habits.

2 Likes

Can also be called “The Fuck My Day Diet”

Because consuming 800 calories a day will lead to other problems.

It looks like a 5 day ‘reset’ not a permanent thing. As such, it’s probably fine.

I would imagine for most people they would lose a good 5lbs+ doing it, but then if their usual habit was bad, they would put that back on over the rest of the month. Overall it would probably maintain weight, at a guess, and within the course of a month people would go up and down a bit. The concentration for 5 days, being strict, might not be a bad thing, but is obviously not sustainable for longer.

Seems faddy really, as many diet things are.

As ever, if we could all just do what we know we need to do - eat a balanced diet, sensibly, do some exercise to get the heart rate up, and a little strength training to maintain muscle mass which declines, we’d all be fine.

Since most people don’t do that, things like this will always come up.

1 Like

My daughter is adamant that the key to weight loss and retaining such, is to reduce the size of the portions we serve up to ourselves and others…! Simple logic really that makes a lot of sense

2 Likes

Yep, my wife is big on this too. I grew up with roast dinners and piled it on there. She is all about the portion control. Last night for our evening meal we had salmon - delicious, and broccoli. It was lovely and all, but it needed some rice, or risotto, or pasta or potatoes of some kind :joy:

Since Im overweight I’m doing some corrective measures, not too drastic though, as you’ve got to live!

1 Like

When I was growing up it was the same… never ever had a space on the plate between the sprouts and roast potatoes, or the meat and the mashed carrot and turnip… always, always… swimming in gravy… Mmmmm!
Now I dread her putting my dinner down in front of me… with gaps between the contents that you could drive a bus through… they looking more like a sample of the main meal, rather than it being the main meal itself.!!
What can I say though… she loves her Dad and she is starving me for my own good… so she says :0)

2 Likes

She’s showing her love, and no, you don’t have to have starchy carbs to make a meal satisfying.

3 Likes

You don’t have to, but it certainly helps.

1 Like

Weight loss is 95% diet.

1 Like

It’s better to have an extra portion of meat rather than having the extra equivalent starch.

Exactly. Cut down on some carbs if overweight. It’s well known. And the meal was delicious and satisfying! She baked a side of salmon, and we have a lovely rub that we put on it. The rest of the salmon is in the fridge and we will make some great lunches from it with salad, couscous and veggies.

1 Like

Do you actually I believe I said anything to justify such a question? I described multiple areas where bias and bad ethics can exist that are universal in all research. When that is the case you need actually effective methods for identifying these issues. Simply pointing to the source of funding may be one that makes people feel like they are being savvy, but trivializes real challenges that exist in research and naively ignores where the interest in funding research actually is.

Sure, the media handling of science is appalling.