Nike kits, money for our new CB

https://x.com/fumlerrawk/status/1835037859239084146?s=46&t=qjQdwJi2khWQQz87wqB34A

Apparently a reliable source. Adidas going with a more retro vibe for their kits next year, I really like the third.

1 Like

All three of those are vast improvements on this year’s pitiful offerings.

3 Likes

Well they have collars, prefer our third to that white one to be honest.

Like to see that Green on the third back. Hopefully they’ve sorted the size thing.

1 Like

White kit looks similar to the recent United away kits, not sure how I feel about the badge but it’s still a decent kit. Home is nice as well though would prefer a yellow trim. Third kit logo looks so much better than the other two as well.

1 Like

I don’t about you, folks, but these ones are stunningly beautiful in my eyes.

Which obviously means that we will get three abominations like the third kit from 2012/13.

2 Likes

Yeah not keen on the badge on the white shirt, prefer as similar badge to our home kit but in red

1 Like

Please let the green one be true.

i see Macherano when i see that Red - love the old school badges. One on the green is my all time fave lfc badge

Yeah… this is much more us.

Looking forward to it even more now.

1 Like

https://x.com/TimesSport/status/1848773362526663075

1 Like

Hopefully this bridges the gap toward the bumper deal Man Utd got. I get that they are a global juggernaut, but it has been a fallow decade, and surely we are closing that gap now, and we should be looking for 60M minimum, with a chance, with sales, to get towards the 90M they got.

Where the ……. John.

2 Likes

Yeah the fact we are quoted as taking 60m (after 30m from Nike which with shirt sales etc came ‘close to 60m’) whereas United are still taking 90m is a bit concerning. Surely any kit deal over the last 3 years would be for at least similar to what United would earn?

1 Like

https://x.com/TheAnfieldTalk/status/1857367313949069624

Do modern players have an issue with collars.

1 Like

Which logo do you prefer?

  • Old logo
  • New logo
0 voters

When you’re asked like that, it’s just natural for me to prefer the old one.

It’s actually really nice, not messy, has multiple details that go well together and it’s original.

Now, I do understand the arguments behind the new one (especially for marketing, brand and product reasons), though I’d say that I don’t like the whole minimalism in everything wankfest.

You can have too much details, but you can also go too far with minimalism also. Certain things or designs become too cold or too ordinary. Juventus’ new one is something I’d never support or grow to like. Our new one is alright, we haven’t invented something, but we’ve removed a lot.

The whole Liverbird story also… not sure I’d leave almost all the focus to it, either.

Surely some things are not to be touched/changed just because it fits well within a social media profile picture, more distinctive tattoos or a small product in the club’s shop.

These things might change again.

3 Likes

I think it is a bit messy to be honest anyhow the new one is pretty my much the old one.

1 Like

I like the new one, and agree it is basically the old old one!

I do like the intricate logo with all the meaning behind the different parts. It tells a story so there’s a lot of merit in keeping it.

But as a slight preference, I just like clean and clear, and the liver bird is it. Liver bird. LFC. Job’s a good un. And instantly I see a sweeping end to end move with a cracking Terry McDermott header to finish it off.

3 Likes