The Great Political Philosophy thread!

The problem is always capturing the investments one cares about - for real estate and much of stock trading, there really isn’t much of a connection to productivity to begin with, and a lot of the thinking around capital gains taxes centers capturing some of that appreciation.

I do think there is a real connection between capital gains taxes and reduced investment (heck, we know the Laffer curve was empirically observable - but incredibly rare and nowhere near the general case that it became rhetorically). The UK’s fundamental problem is that it absolutely needs to collect tax on one form of capital appreciation, while encouraging higher levels of other forms of capital. Capital gains tax is a blunt instrument in that regard.

1 Like

Not really. He’s summed up Libertarians. The fact that many people who subscribe to this idea are absolutely unbearable doesn’t invalidate the idea itself.

There was a time, not so long ago, when the Libertarian Party of the U.S. was not simply a refuge for disgraced members of the GOP. Nowadays, it’s like a minor league affiliate of the GOP; you have sex with a child, we’re going to send you to the Libertarian Party, at least until you learn how to delete your text messages and any other evidence.

2 Likes

Ironically, they were originally a left-wing/anarchist movement. They had a knack of quickly getting killed off by both authoritarian left and right wing governments.
The modern incarnation have almost nothing in common with whatever the term originally meant, apart from selectively claiming to be anti-government.

1 Like

This goes back to why I started this thread. I find the centring of political discussion around parties and simplistic labels too reductive, and it really doesn’t help foster any consensus at all.

That’s why I asked the question up the thread what “modern conservative” views are like. Because I don’t see any coherent philosophy (not having had time to watch the video provided by @SBYM) at all, just a set of grievances about minorities, tax, and not being able to use their favourite vocabulary about the former. It feels more like an identity rather than political values, and if the next day Trump or Farage were to start espousing liberal values, their cult would move with them.

Of course the cynical would suggest that’s exactly what the billionaires want in order to divide us plebs…

2 Likes

Nvm.

I’m not sure it exists anymore. They calm themselves modern conservatives but they’re really a mix of old far right idiots, populists and fascists.

1 Like

Surely the idea has it’s roots in the work of Adam Smith.

1 Like

Politically, I would call myself a market conservative. The ‘modern’ does a lot of work there. I walked away from a fairly high level of political activity 20 years ago precisely because far too often I was expected to happily share a ‘big tent’ with social conservatives whose ideas centered around dictating how other people lived, who also expected the state to intervene in the economy to shape it toward how they wished to live. I realized I rarely shared any fundamental views at all with the majority of ‘conservatives’.

3 Likes

Doesn’t that make you a classical liberal though?

You’re an economist by trade, aren’t you?

Certainly strong elements of that, but also an element of distrust of government attempting to produce change that would come from Burke. I also think classical liberals fall into the trap of the ‘state of nature’ fallacy, reasoning from a hypothetical where there is a magically protected free market and no other institutions, when the reality is that free markets are themselves an institution that require protection in and from a free society.

2 Likes

Yes - at one point, I would have said Chicago school.

1 Like

Yeah it does. Considerations of liberty are relevant to include in every debate/decision about government, but extending that out into a stand-alone philosophy necessitates absurd end points meaning it is only loons, or dishonest people, who only end up there. All the good things about libertarianism can very easily be incorporated into standard liberal or conservative ideology.

1 Like

I knew we had you pegged down wrong, good on you for sponsoring so many needy little urchins!

1 Like

Qu’ils mangent de la brioche!

3 Likes

Ftfy

But more importantly,

4 Likes

Interesting perspective

1 Like