The Man Utd thread

Hes never been a proflic goalscorer his best 2 goal scoring seasons he has 17 league goals he only gets into double firgures twice more with 10 and 11 goals.

Hey, he scored 30 goals in a season once!!!

His scoring is probably the most marked area of his failure to develop. He has never really added anything else to his basic move - touch right with the outside of his right boot, drive diagonally toward the box, and shoot. It was never as good as Coutinho’s version of it, and he is more of a one-trick pony with it. A better run club and/or one with solid veteran leadership could have used that as a foundation, just never happened. Obviously, he has to bear some responsibility for that too, but giving him that monster contract at that age and then no coaching support got him most of the way toward stagnation.

2 Likes

Not league goals i don’t count stat padding in EFL cup as goals

Not that I agree nor disagree, I’m just adding what the common defence of him is.

Rashford’s numbers are/were pretty good in my opinion, considering the position he’s mostly played, the fact that he came through as a young player and the general unsucessful period for United during almost the entirity of that time. Okay, as it turned out, he became a key player and key players highly influence a team that is successful or not. But there’s been a lack of consistency, more than anything. Perhaps also not adding more layers to his game. He’s a very dangerous offensive player when in form, though not the most rounded in terms of skills. I’m not sure if he ever managed to put two top seasons together. Or sometimes keep it up for one entire season.

2 Likes

I think Man Utd is very toxic anyhow and I don’t think the new manager has done much to help that.

Let’s see what happens with him out of that. He may continue being shit or he may find some form.

1 Like

https://x.com/DeadlineDayLive/status/1889216299630555584

5 Likes

Another P45 for a tea lady

1 Like

Nothing to see here. Just plain ol costcutting.

Also. Countdown for United fans to be overjoyed when Ratcliffe does sell his stake…back to the Glazers

1 Like

The Glazers will end up selling the whole lot, including Sir Jim’s stake, to someone in the Middle East. Sheikh Jassim was very close, but Sir Jim was a useful idiot for the Glazer’s. They are very greedy indeed, and will want a new owner to build a stadium, clear the debts, and give them north of 6 Billion for their trouble, arguably much more. I think that’s the end game. I just can’t see how Sir Jim factors into it, in terms of whole ownership.

Probably a positive that he gets that infrastructure deal.

He’s probably there to take the stick from the fans and get a move on in terms of government clearances/funding etc for the stadium.

There’s absolutely no way that the UK government should countenance spending money for a stadium for a club when they’ve given another club in the same city a stadium. But Ratcliffe didn’t get to where he is without knowing the persons in power.

1 Like

Sir Jim fucking over working class Mancunians again:

4 Likes

What did I say about the P45 for the tea lady :joy:

5 Likes

I could think of 11 redundancies straightaway…

5 Likes

If I was a Utd fan my blood would be running cold at the Ineos comments in response to this. They signed a contract. They had a legal commitment to pay the NZRU and as soon as they found themselves in a less strong financial position tried to reneg on the deal they freely made. They are now crticizing the NZRU for not working to come to a ā€œmanaged settlement.ā€ Bitch, the only offer I’ll accept is the amount you agreed to pay us.

6 Likes

Having worked for Ineos you know the man is Stunt.

3 Likes

I’m wondering how many fucking people they have on the books to be able to keep punting them on this scale and still keep the lights on.

Also, even if the people he is cutting are valued at 70k each (inclusive of on-costs), he’s hardly putting a dent in Ā£300m.

4 Likes