Yes. 
1 Like
More likely to be perineal.
1 Like
Oh dear, Ratcliffe has feelings.
14 Likes
2 Likes
Poor lamb.
1 Like
Rise of the tea lady union.
Thereās a film in that. Add light sabres and it would be classic.
1 Like
I particularly love the juxtaposition of the tough guy āI donāt mind making tough decisionsā posture with the petulance.
5 Likes
He has just disclosed his achilles heel to their fanbaseā¦
If you donāt want Rat Man at the clubā¦ abuse away
1 Like
I finally watched that interview Jim did with Neville and thought it was an absolute car crash. I cannot believe it isnāt getting more coverage.
The worst part was Neville challenged him on the cancellation of the retired playersā fund. Nev pointed out it was ultimately a trivial amount of money and spitballed several ways the money could have easily been made up so a culturally important program could have been maintained and Jimās response was to say āthatās a good idea, but no one suggested that so we couldnt do it.ā
A real business genius they have over there
12 Likes
What is really revealing about that is not the business side of it, but the lack of awareness of how important something like that is to preserve the idea of club rather than franchise. Neville clearly understands that if a cut like that was absolutely necessary, finding an alternative was not a priority. Ratcliffe just didnāt.
4 Likes
The people who would suggest that probably were shown the doors before.
4 Likes
I thought he had a little pop at the Glazerās in there too. He offered the carrot - theyāve been abused, they put up with a lot, and if it gets like that for me I will be off.
But he also said, āwe bought in, and Iāve not seen them since.ā
I read that as a criticism, not just an expression of sympathy with the supposed hard done by Glazerās who donāt feel as though they can attend a game.
Oh, and the main thing in all this?
For the Glazers, Leveraged buy-outs are toxic and should be outlawed.
Edit
Or regulated more strictly, to stop unscrupulous owners from taking too much out and jeopardizing the existence of the club. We had our own history with that.
The club is paying for the loans for the Glazerās to reap dividends and grow their asset by billions. They have done it to such an extent that even a financial juggernaut like Man Utd is handcuffed and potentially vulnerable in what it can do moving forward. Thatās the Glazers. They deserve all the stick they get, and more besides.
As for Sir Jim, stop sacking the lowly workers! It is damaging the lives of many people who have been the backbone of the wider club. The values in doing it just seem misplaced. Yes, efficiency is fine. Letās do that, but wisely, and to a point. So how about the stupid in-out debacle with Ashworth, on Sir Jimās watch? How many millions were wasted there? And thatās before we even touch the fees paid for crap players, and wages offered for crap players.
But letās sack the lowly worker, or take their lunch away, and stop funding for much needed club-related charity workā¦
All against the backdrop of a terrible team, languishing near the bottom, and showing no signs of improving to the degree where they will be relevant any time soon.
Sir Jim rightly gets no sympathy. Not only that, heās an idiot - a useful idiot for the Glazers - because he parted with his cash, straight into their pockets, and they control the asset which is worth billions, and they donāt have the hassle of having to actually touch the thing any more.
Nasty idiot, Sir Jim. No sympathy from me!
5 Likes
Nothing on what Iāve read about Ratcliffe leads me to suggest he has any business acumen whatsoever.
Heās just a senile old prick with ideas of grandeur far beyond his actual worth.
1 Like
Thats not really the fault of the LBO though, its the money wasted on poor transfers and wages over the last 5 to 10 years.
I donāt think the LBO would have been a question had the club continued to rake in the revenues. At that point , you would have argued that the club was doing well even with the debt hanging in over them.
But , they have spent billions on substandard players and are increasingly finding out that their sponsorships etc arenāt going to get them nearly enough money to sustain themselves.
Thatās where the topic of the debt and the dividends taken out by Glazers comes into play.
Thatās fair. LBO can work if you do it wisely. In their instance they have over extended and taken things to the max, and at the same time, they have squandered millions. Theyāve had the worst of both sides of it. Too much money has been taken out, and the money they have spent - lots of it to be fair, although now the coffers are drying up - has been squandered.
1 Like
This whole new stadium / area redevelopment pitch is nothing more than a pitch to get a new buyer in. Someone who will be happy to pay what Glazers demand as well as clear off the debt.
1 Like
Glazers have more than made whatever money they kept into buying the club with their dividends alone.
And that doesnāt even include the 1.1 billion that they got from Ratcliffe.
1 Like
Donāt really have sympathy for the manures though. Fuck them.
I think this is spot on. Sheikh Jassim, or similar, to the rescue. In the meantime they are probably watching what happens to the Man City case before riding in to rescue Man Utd.
Thatās another reason why we desperately need the right outcome for Man City, or all bets are off.
In a money no object world, someone will sort it all out for Man Utd for 10 Billion - 5 billion for Glazer shares, 2 billion for Sir Jim, 1 billion for debt, 2 billion for stadium.
I will puke when it happens.
1 Like