For which they should be investigated, tried and shot if found guilty.
Take cover
I gave up years ago. I just stand here grinning waiting for the custard pies. You see the people who disagree with me wonât pull a trigger
Fucking lefties these days⌠Iâm at 13% and thus better than you.
For someone who has been accused on here of being an elderly gammon faced Tory, I got 10.5%
I actually self identify as Wolfie Smith by the way.
I donât think it is.
Forgive me for going a bit conservative on this but there is this issue within certain circles that things cost X and do so without challenge. It gets passed too easily. Combine it with the difficulty that the public sector has with procurement and you basically get ripped off.
Consultants are and have become experts at ripping the arse out of public clients. It honestly needs to be stopped.
Iâm speaking from experience on both sides of the fence.
3.5x more facist than me.
Struggling to even see you from up here.
29.55%
Canât get away from the fact that itâs basically 3 questions asked 10 times each.
Iâd argue that an educated professional wouldnât have the time.
But then, Iâd argue that an education profession should be an education professional because thatâs what they want to do.
If a teacher wants to be an MP, they are going to have to make a choice. You canât really be a teacher on the side, and I donât think you can be an MP on the side either.
For someone who has been accused on here of being an elederly gammon faced Tory, I got 10.5%
I actually self identify as Wolfie Smith by the way.
9.6% right wing for me.
The questions were quite similar, but I suppose the research is designed that way to eradicate selective reading of the question.
You canât stand for election if youâre a teacher. You donât have the time and you canât leave your job because of the mortgage.
Actually, when you think it through, this post is bollocks
Well, itâs one way to solve the immigration issue
I was really reluctant to do that test , but did anyway and scored 25.7 %.
Being an atheist , a lot of the questions were meaningless to me , so I just went neutral. The ones that were so vague as to make no sense got the same answer.
25.7% puts me second only to Klopptimist if Iâm not mistaken , which for somebody who considers himself centre-left , came as quite the surprise.
Poland beware ⌠the English are coming !
I was really reluctant to do that test , but did anyway and scored 25.7 %.
Being an atheist , a lot of the questions were meaningless to me , so I just went neutral. The ones that were so vague as to make no sense got the same answer.
A lot of those religious questions are assessing how far you think religion should impose on state, to what extent religious values should be the basis for our societies values, and whether you agree with persecuting non religious voices.
As an atheist, I would think youâd be strongly against those ideas, so I think you may have done yourself a disservice answering those quesions neutrally.
Well any mention of religion generally gets a shrug of the shoulders from me , and I must admit I wasnât thinking too deeply about my answers.
I think itâs one of those tests where a really high percentage is probably a pretty good indicator that youâre, in this case, a total certified authoritarian, whereas the differences between lower percentages probably donât mean all that much.
I think the religion questions tend to be more heated in the US as they specifically have separation of state and religion. The âshrug of the shouldersâ is an healthy response.
Iâm anything but though.
Sorry mate, the âyouâ in âyouâreâ wasnât meant as you, peterroberts, but the generic you.
Fucking hell, my English again.
What I meant was, that if someone scores, say 80% on that, itâs probably a fairly good indicator that person is an authoritarian. Whereas the difference between e.g. 10 and 20 probably doesnât mean all that much.