UK Politics Thread (Part 4)

More importantly it would be unfair.

I live in Birmingham and the councils finance control is shocking. Birmingham City Council, lost a court case about equal pay many moons ago, sold the National Exhibition Centre, ICC, Genting Arena and the Barclay card arena for £1.1bn to cover the bill but apparently they still owe money and no one knows how much. I think I read somewhere that they were using the same system as the Post Office.
I can imagine it is replicated across many local councils, as your link highlights.

I quoted your exact words.

How???
I’m not arguing, I’m debating and giving an alternative opinion to your views. If that’s infuriating you then give your ā€œhead a wobbleā€. Do you think that you don’t infuriate me? I am happy to stop debating with you as you cannot accept being challenged. @redfanman corrected me yesterday and I acknowledged that.
However, when you can’t answer you move the point to put a change on the rhetoric of the conversation. Suggesting you ignore me, calling me a Strawman and asking @redalways ā€œwhat’s his excuse thenā€ is all signs of someone who doesn’t like to be challenged, trying to shut down an opinion/voice, that may actually have (not stating) a more balanced view than the Echo chamber you like to live in.

Thank you for correcting me. We won’t go into the reasons as to why austerity measures had to be made. :+1:t2: I accept bad decisions were made, some may argue were forced into.

See, you do have some good points :+1:t2:

Sure, there was a problem with the public finances because of the 2008 crash but we were working our way out if it. Labour were finished back then so the tories came in and basically shut everything down, shrunk everything and ripped the heart out if it all and as a result really didnt achieve much.

We’re still suffering from decisions made back then. It was a choice and not a forced one. Valid perhaps but clearly didnt work in restoring health to the economy. We actually lost far far more than we gained from it. Brexit rose from this decision.

1 Like

Yes, but there’s nothing where I said anything like what you have said.

1 Like

No you aren’t.

You’ve twice said words to the effect that I hate all farmers and think everyone who sends their kids to private school is offshoring wealth levels of rich

I have never said this. I’ve corrected you and you still persist with this strawman.

This isn’t wanting an echo chamber. It just expecting the basic courtesy that if you want to challenge my views, you at least represent those views fairly. As @redalways is also finding, this seems to be a trend.

If you can’t or won’t do that, and you don’t seem to want to, there is no point continuing.

That isn’t helpful.

Yes, let’s keep importing all that shite from the USA.

4 Likes

Pity we can’t roll it back 61 years and have him aborted.

Cunt.

2 Likes

They were good points, did I contest any of them? :+1:t2:

I have quoted your response to Dane above, regarding offshoring wealth.

Interpret my words how you want, but I don’t think I used words to suggest hate. I definitely suggested you assumed quite a lot.

I am not on here to offend/annoy/troll anyone on this forum.
Please don’t take my comments personally, but I do find your comments very ā€œPot Kettleā€. In my opinion you have a very aggressive debating/posting style, Infact another poster alluded to it - almost like a ā€˜Thats how he is’ kind of comment. So, I don’t know why you have taken this ā€˜Mom he is picking on me’ attitude.
I always try and be respectful of people’s views, I accept that at times I may have responded in a similar tone to the poster, hence my use of ā€œGive your head a wobbleā€, which is something you said to me a while back.
Additionally, I always try to air my views fairly. Was it not you who dismissed all Leavers as basing their opinion on a quick Google search, whilst Remainers were all educated. I suppose that is fair….

Anyhow, i am not trying to be personal. I just believe you should reflect on your own style/actions before calling someone else out.

:+1:t2:

1 Like

I’m not the only person who has expressed frustration that you have misreprenyed their views. So maybe you are the one who should be reflecting.

That seems a bit odd. It sounds like she was given the boot, but they wanted to give her an opportunity to resign.

This does feel like a genuine mistake based on the statement.

If the version of events is real, that is - it feels quite strange that Police would press charges. I had a similar thing years ago when I got burgled. I said a camera had been stolen, and a couple of days later I found it. They just amended the report.

I find it incredibly hard to believe that the police would press charges because a distressed woman reported a phone was stolen during a mugging that she later found.

It feels like there is more than this going on.

2 Likes

The article also claims that she had already declared it when appointed to the shadow cabinet, so I’m wondering if she quit because it’s surfaced in reporting now, or if there’s some deeper reason.

2 Likes