I just woke up to read all the news and then delightfully headed to Red Cafe.
Exhibit A of the entertainment……
“For years our rivals have built skyscrapers and we’ve just been concealing cracks with lead paint on a crumbling palace where we’ve also stuffed the old foundations with plastic bags filled with cat shit.”
Watching that clip of Neville on Sky Sports, can someone explain to me in the context of a football club, who controls the organisational structure of the club? Wouldn’t it be the CEO? So the CEO would lead on organisational change and get final sign off from the board of directors? Or am I wrong on this and it’s the owners?
Who is making the decision to flick the switch and go out and panic buy each year when the fans start getting twitchy and inevitably make the wrong choice? Who is responsible for consistently hiring players on massive money who have absolutely appalling attitudes? More importantly, who is responsible for hiring the person who is making those decisions?
I actually find it difficult to blame the players. They are who they are. It’s the United management who are responsible for choosing bad players.
I have asked this question before and I’ll ask again: putting ability side, are there any United players with the attitude to play in a Klopp side, or heck, even a Pep side? They all just seem to have a fucking terrible attitude. It says it all that their captain had had a run-in with foreign law enforcement.
@WeeJoe beat me to it. Those would by my choices as well to be honest. I think they’ve been swamped by the tidal wave of crap circulating around the dressing room.
Just thinking there randomly, did Man United ever face punishment for their fans breaking into the stadium and getting our game called off last season? Also sitting outside our hotel room keeping us inside. Feel like that got brushed under the carpet. Dangerous times if that was let go and you can just go around causing games to be postponed when your team is not on form or has injuries. Think I’ve an idea if we ever play City without our main lads fit
Sounds a bit odd given the difficulties Spurs had bringing someone in, if Ten Haag didn’t interview well at Spurs I imagine it was less about his lack of demands and more likely something else that put them off.
Of course, if it is true then Ten Haag may have over compensated in his interview with Utd which partially led them to signing him after reportedly having their own doubts about him…