Why have only one when five can give the same resultâŠitâs the MauUre way.
Iâm actually a bit disappointed in that, youâd expect him to have more and then you realise he didnât play a few games
M y favourite part was when HĂžjlund was definitely much better than NĂșñez.
Itâs like 100m people across the globe all shut their heads in a safe door at the same time and forgot the JK years ever happened.
Yeah but if you add Mount to that list then things changeâŠ.
That is really a staggering graphic
Nunez (ÂŁ78.5M) versus Sancho (ÂŁ73M), Antony (ÂŁ82M), Martial (ÂŁ45M), Rashford (academy), Hojlund (ÂŁ72M).
Maguire has a goal, at 1 goal and ÂŁ80M he is not a terrible fit.
I think youâve overpriced Nuñez.
Fify
From hereâŠ
Quite a listâŠ
Tyrell Malacia, ÂŁ15.7m
5/10
Christian Eriksen, free
6/10
Lisandro MartĂnez, ÂŁ56.7m
7/10
Casemiro, ÂŁ52m
7/10
Antony, ÂŁ85.6m
4/10
Martin Dubravka, loan
5/10
Wout Weghorst, loan
5/10
Jack Butland, loan
N/A
Marcel Sabitzer, loan
5/10
Mason Mount, ÂŁ55m
4/10
André Onana, £44.1m
5/10
Rasmus HĂžjlund, ÂŁ72m
7/10
Jonny Evans, free
6/10
Altay Bayindir, ÂŁ4.3m
N/A
Sofyan Amrabat, loan
4/10
Sergio ReguilĂłn, loan
7/10
Those scores are fuuuuccked. Somehow, awful players are getting a 4/10, and when a player is a tick above bad, that suddenly makes that player a 7/10?
Fuck off.
Most Liverpool players must be a 15/10 with this scoring method.
My thoughts exactlyâŠ
Even JKâs biggest miss, Naby, did more than most of those plonkers.
Casemiro isnât a 7/10 transfer considering his age and his transfer fees.
His decline is already apparent.
And how is Hojlund rated 7/10. Thereâs little evidence so far.
The writer must be a united fan.
The only guy who probably deserves the 7 is Martinez.
We need to remember though that Bruno would be a guaranteed starter in our Liverpool team.
Wouldnât even have Bruno in the midfield in last season
I would have, just to flog him off to Saudi.
Personally Iâd change the water after removing the turd but Iâm a bit mental like that.
United fans: Ha. One man team.