He can’t change the laws of physics though. I think @Arminius gave a pretty good explanation of why that isn’t feasible.
Again, the carbon emissions manufacture of them, let alone transport, is offset within months. If you consider the fact that they are replacing methods of electricity generation that would otherwise emit far more carbon then it makes complete sense.
Not just physics, but the economics of it too. China didnt happen to become so dominant in this field by accident or overnight.
Meanwhile the UK appears to have labour shortages across most of its key industries already. Much more important for the country to focus on getting the new ‘green’ power stations built and connected to the grid as soon as possible to help secure domestic energy, and reduce costs to the environment, households and industry.
So can’t we use the sea water…de-salinate it…keep the salt…or sell it…then we have water to use during a drought or hot weather…or am I being a bit naive.
If having more clean water available, so my water bills don’t go up, it is economically viable…it could help us at the moment …as we are being warned of water shortages…
I guess the answer to that would have been to hold water companies responsible for burst pipes and other leakages from the moment they were privatised, but I guess that was too much to ask for. Can’t be inconveniencing shareholders, you know?