How do these people get so much info. I’m literally in the ME now and know almost nothing!
Without saying too much though I did download X just to check the account and can say that at least some of his info is wrong.
Really?
You don’t think they already are a failed state?
Hello !
I am not sure how to respond to your post. I am not sure if you have a higher security clearance that would make you privy to information that Open Source Intelligence cannot detect and I am not sure what you are doing in the ME.
As for that account, I don’t know if every post that account has posted is accurate 100%, but strongly doubt it (some posts will likely have some minor incorrect data). But the current deployment is being followed by observers and experts and you can get information that wasn’t possible without a security clearance years ago. I have a fairly wide array of good sources and so far, as far as I know, everything about the broad picture is correct. I am fairly good at filtering. One way of filtering on twitter is to find the OSINT sources that serious professors and experts use and then check the account and comments (is this an account where low brow people comment or is it an account where serious people comment), as an example. Then after that you have to assess the track record of the account. But there are errors obviously, even the best Open Source will have a few now and then. But if planes fly with transponders on then those who cares about such matters, knows. If they fly in a certain formation, one suspects they are towing jets and etc. And then we have satelites.
You can find most of the info on this deployment in MSM, for instance Axios.
Are there (just an example) 100 tankers exact in the operation area ? Probably not. Maybe it is 98 or 102. But such minor errors does not truly concern me, as I use this data to understand world events more than count individual tanks and artillery pieces etc.
Regars, Magnus
1 Like
shrugs
He is such a little whiny bitch
https://x.com/FaytuksNetwork/status/2024482924096057755
2 Likes
Starmer should keep standing up to Trump. It’s the only way.
3 Likes
Really, I think he should start. He has seemingly tried to curry favour casting the UK as an obsequious client state that Trump can work with, but ignored the two key parts of dealing with Trump - everything he does is personal, and everything he does is transactional. Starmer is for better of for worse the antithesis of what Trump respects, so every gesture of amity is seen as weakness until proven otherwise.
5 Likes
Trump is an idiot, “Responsibility to Protect” could have been invoked with ease after the horrific massacres in Iran. It would have made Trump’s Iran war legal and legitimate. But instead, he is talking about attacking Iran for all kind of reasons, not just nuclear; and some of them extremely shady.
1 Like
I hear you. He should start.
I should have said it better. After not allowing America to use the RAF base Starmer should continue to stand up to Trump, as it’s the only way.
100% agree he is transactional and everything is personal. Even if you keep bending over backwards for him he will still do what he wants, when he wants, and will betray you to suit.
So don’t play his game. Carney is a great example to follow.
3 Likes
Yep, good point. A clear and focused action, based on protecting the Iranian people from the Ayatollah, would be legitimate.
But Trump is no statesman, so Israel will be in his ear and he will end up doing their bidding, again, while also seeking to enrich himself and bump the Epstein news off the front pages.
2 Likes
Starmer now has put himself of needing to antagonize Trump in order to stand up for the UK’s position, and will likely end up worse off than being firm behind closed doors and not overly friendly publicly. Contrary to the AI Carney wet dream a little earlier, Canada has avoided direct public confrontation for the past year precisely to avoid this kind of impasse where Trump has to climb down or escalate. Hence the now rather awkward delay around the F-35 deal.
2 Likes
Impossible to tell with this admin where the line is between incompetence and inhumanity
https://x.com/ReichlinMelnick/status/2024259372289851579?s=20
2 Likes
JAG? Is that a military lawyer?
Help!
Joe Rogan, I’m just a populist everyman who normies resonate with…just dont touch me or talk to me if you have a real job because you skeeze me out
2 Likes
Yeah, Judge Advocate General
2 Likes
Yeah Feds from all over have been reassigned to immigration enforcement. JAGs were being used to replace immigration judges previously (on the expectation their lack of immigration experience would see them more likely to buy the government’s BS arguments in immigration court than an actual experienced immigration judge), but it seems they are putting them on the other side as well to help with the case load
1 Like
I’m glad there’s a route for some kick back on this.
The whole legal / illegal immigration is a complete side show (complete distraction) to what is happening
Trump doing his “no homo” routine at his Board of Peace meeting 
https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/2024500611601834075?s=20
3 Likes
Read this one about them using actual immigration hearings, people who definition are following the rules to maintain their legal status, to apprehend them and in many cases deport them. Illegally.
https://x.com/FrederickMelo/status/2024228783138439445?s=20
3 Likes
He just made a headline in Norway right now, after claiming that Norway is to host the next Board of Peace meeting.
It’s funny
Foreign Ministry having to spend time denying Trump claims about hosting conferances is a bit silly.
2 Likes