The girl has got serious issues , which cannot even be explained away solely because of the miracle that her benevolent dictator visited upon her ;
“She has said that she suffered from bone cancer and that it was legislation Mr. Trump signed in 2018 that provided her access to experimental treatments.” (And saved her life.)
There’s clearly more going on here in that girl’s head and who knows how she’ll handle it when her Lord and Saviour is finally wheeled out. Badly ,I suspect.
People within the circle have been whispering for a while that its a deeply weird and troubling relationship. Ossoff isnt digging this line up from no where and can only comment on it because the seed has already been planted by public reporting. That is why it has generated such a robust response from the RW - her simply being someone he is fucking is the least dangerous version of the story for them.
just out of interest, for someone who cant be arsed to become well red on the matter, but can someone explain;
why is the Presidents assistant all of a sudden become fair game for some really mysoginistic assumptions?
Explain more than what the previous 2 posts provided?
No way is he banging her,
Not at his age, and given his health,
She’ll end up pissing all over him! 
I don’t much care who is banging who in the White House.
The major issue is his posts are his personal declarations if she is writing them without full oversight that’s really a concern.
Did I hear that US Treasury yields topped 5.3% yesterday?
The 30 year, yes. Auction for another tranche of them today. Bessent clearly feeling pressure, because US Treasury department doubled the size of their buyback. Short-term that has taken the edge off yields, but the market has already swallowed a larger intervention in the yen (US sold Euro bonds to buy yen).
My guess is smelling a lot of full adult diapers
yeah, i mean those two posts are the issue…
people ‘whispering’ about her is hardly worthy of condemning her
and insinuating that because she was able to gain access to medication she would make herself sexually avaliable to a man of power.
both statements, used as evidence, are a bit troubling to me.
i know Trump is Trump, this is not a defence of him, or his party, its more me just pointing out that some of the stuff being used here, is maybe a bit over a line?
i remember the issues around Kamalas aparent rise to power and stuff about kneepads and thought that was bang out of line too.
That insinuation was never made in the article I posted from the NYT , nor was it by me. ( I do plead guilty though to suggesting that she’s not a full shilling.)
The insinuation was made however by the White House and ‘outraged’ Republicans after Kirsten Holmes referred to the remarks from Jon Ossoff. Tellingly , Trump himself seemed totally unperturbed by the exchange at the time.
To me it’s just another example of Republicans accusing their opponents of the type of smear that they regularly use themselves , and then demand , by way of distraction , that the press should follow their lead , which is of course what invariably happens.
Sounds like a fun piece of machinery!
Newt Gingrich posted: “Jon Ossoff owes Natalie Harp a personal apology for having smeared her.”
This got me chuckling. Is Next insinuating something happened between Ossoff and Harp? 
'The renewed scrutiny of Harp has turned up the story that for more than a year, she refused to get a routine security clearance to work at the White House. ’
I think that probably bears greater examination too.
Yup and as I said I couldn’t care less about who is having sexual relations. Someone who couldn’t get clearance is apparently the one posting these social posts at 3 in the morning some often direct threats to other countries.
