The pro would be he would have to be dead. The con is, well him.
Plus the Pope thinks he is a wrongâun.
We told Zelensky, 'You can do whatever you want to Russia, but donât hit the refineries because thatâs a world problem
said the man who actions caused the closure of the Strait of Hormuz,
where 20% of the Worldâs oli flows from
As James Hetfield sang
Doesnât matter what you see
Or into it what you read
You can do it your own way
If itâs done just how I say
People will equate this to the famous Tuskegee study, where a program systematically withheld diagnosis and treatment of syphilis for black patients so that the natural progression of the disease could be studied. That horror is the basis of our laws and ethics guidelines for human subject research.
https://x.com/jakescottMD/status/2108071726911484306?s=20
The thing is, there was at least a valid question to explore in the Tuskegee study. This is just systemized violence
![]()
I adore your last sentence. Thanks for the chuckle.
This is a low stab towards the groin region with a stiletto
Seems the orange toddler has many failings,the first he is not god,but thinks he is so all should obey him,but there are a lot that use him or take the piss and he thinks they are wonderful cos they listenâŚsomething that no one does except his Maga lot.
He cant even get brownie points for sorting out Putin and dumping Zelenski as Putin is playing him like a lazy trout.
In short the village idiotsâ idiot.
Yes yes 1 million times yes
Good thing we got rid of DEI so people can now be hired purely based on merit rather than hiring people to fill an ideological or demographic quota.
Jon Ossoff destroyed that Collins guy in this debateâŚ
Here is the full coverage for others that havenât yet watched - Pity that JO has no interest in running for President 2028
No one believes this. This is something he has to say otherwise why vote for him now if heâs going to be gone after 1/3 of his term, and will spend the bulk of that first 2 years pursing a different job. But he is not only 100% running, he is as close as you can get to a consensus favourite in a field this big this early.
Predictions are a mugs game, but it does strike me that a critical of israel Jew, as Ossoff is, is the best lane to be in if youâre going to navigate how difficult that issue is in Democratic politics these days and as far as I know its only him and Pritzker who can do that.
He does have a âtypeâ!
Shapiro?
Ossoff looks like a presidential candidate to me.
Edit: Didnât see your last comment when I posted. ![]()
The next time he criticizes Israel will be his first.
I despise him, but Rahm Emanuel will play an interesting role. He cannot win, but he will bring important ideas and positions to the debate that more cautious candidates would otherwise avoid, but will eventually adopt similar positions once Rahm has made room for people to take them.
Itâs incredible. Right across the board all metrics associated with anti-social or RW online conversations has fallen off the cliff. You can measure it in a 100 different ways.
I donât think Trump is going to say thank you.
Bill Maher has this long standing thing of condeming Islam per se on the basis of the results of opinion polls coming out of middle eastern countries.
âMuslims in muslim country x say this one bad thing therefore Islam is badâ
Obviously this is astonishingly racist so I dont expect changing realities to alter this perspective, but itâs worthwhile to contrast that with results of pre-election polls from Israel
Will this lead to any reevalaution from anyone? Or are we just so committed to âgood guy is good. therefore this thing good guy is doing must be goodâ narrative?
