I miss Antonio
Pogba losing possession still.
Fantastic play from MU there, that attack was lovely. Glad Martial missed, West Ham deserves to go into the break with a lead.
Edit: as I wrote that, a wonderful, wonderful counter for West Ham and good defending from Wan Bisaka.
Man, this is a great game to watch.
Very hard to predict how this ends, but a good first half one have to say. High quality from West Ham, Manchester United subpar but still dangerous enough to merit offensive entertainment, overall, that makes a very entertaining game.
I doubt the second half will be like this. If I were to predict, then MU will be some what stronger, West Ham some what more careful, and the tempo will likely decrease some what from West Ham’s side, while they look for counters to up to tempo on. Now MU will have to attack, so there will be counters, most probably to both sides.
Shot attempts WHU 12 Chevys 3
11 cnuts dressed as zebras.
From the Caf…
Happy Festivus.
Festivus for the rest of us
Regional swear words in England is always fascinating. King Knud the Mighty seems very popular as swear word there I have noticed. Probably something to do with the story (which is fake as fake, as no Dane used to the sea would ever do or say anything so idiotic) about how he tried to command the ocean.
But a “cnut” is not as popular in the Merseyside area ? Not seen it often on this forum, while I see it every single time I visit the so called Red Cafe.
I guess they don’t let you say cunt there…
Can I say that??
Aha !!!
So that’s the issue. I just thought Cnut was the most popular swear word over there. My bad.
When referring to them…definitely.
Cavani off to Madrid
Missed the first half, was cooking dinner for the gang. Opened Youtube to see how Goldbridge is reacting and the Tit is sitting there in a “just eat” top. Now he’s loosing it because Ole has taken V deBeek off.
Ole bringing along beek as he did Dan James.
He seems to think Van De Beek to be a talisman. In my opinion, he has been good some games, but doesn’t seem to be very good for their defensive organisation (so far). I think that’s why he is subbed tbh.
Your team is crap defensively, so change two offensive players for two offensive players. This is genius.
To be fair two offensive divers are better than two offensive uselessers
Like I said above, I think taking off Van de Beek is actually a defensive swap to stabilize the midfield. He wanders a bit too much.
He strikes me as a bit like Fernandes except not as skillful and more honest.