Taking you long enough!
United, City, Chelsea, Everton, Spurs/Mourinho, Fat Sam, Moyesā¦
I was otherwise engaged.
My theory is that no matter what team they support all football fans will argue that there is a biase against their club from the P/L and refs, when in reality I think it is not biase but pure incompetence from the refs and laziness from the P/L to hold them to account and actually try to improve them - hence why they refuse to mic the refs to tv or the stadium pa systems - it would show they donāt know what they are doing and then they ban the media from having any contact with them as that would confirm it
As the late, great John Pinette used to sayā¦
Morgan Sanson, Robert Snodgrass, Andrew Lonergan and Amad Diallo
aint nothing wrong with Frankston.
To put our run in form into perspective prior to the Spurs match
Over the previous five matches
Our record: 0-3-2
Average Shots
LFC 17.8
Opponents 6.8
Shots on Target
LFC 3.2
Opponents 3.2
Possession
LFC 71%
Opponents 29%
What this says is that we were controlling matches, taking many shots, but not executing properly.
I think our form has passed, and we will make a run at the title.
And this quote at the end āBoth men have always insisted their businesses are legitimateāā¦ Yes, we believe you chaps.
The irony being dickheads from Manchester and Wolverhampton are those most likely to sing āfeed the scousersā and other such fucking shiteā¦
ā¦and the B****rds at the FA took Ā£25k fine off him for speaking his mind about Lee Mason. They should hang their heads in shame in this current environment. How much have the FA donated recently to a worthy causeā¦?
Nuno is a good manager and here he shows a good man, one who has never shirked his teams from putting up a fight against the likes of Man City and the rest, one who rarely moans about other clubs and dabbles in mind games.
Fans might be arseholes but I respect Wolves probably more than any of the other 19 clubs.
End of the day bar the Burnley game in which we tested Pope the chances we created were poor, the shots on target against Man Utd were so tame, we had a few chances against Newcastle but if they had actually had a shot they probably would have gone in.
Last night was far better, yes we had the overcomplicated stuff but also the stuff we created was more deadly and should have scored 4 at least.
Now come on mate, be reasonable. If they had shame or senses, a lot of problems just wouldnāt be there, right!
The big obvious difference was that we turned the Spurs defense last night. We got behind them and had defenders facing their own goal. We havenāt done that in a while and last night aside Iād say we havenāt done anywhere near enough of it all season, and perhaps beyond that.
That for me is the major difference between us and City. Their whole game plan is about getting behind defenses. We manage it really well against teams that like to defend high. Not so much against a low block and a big area for us to work on I think.
Space was there against Burnley, I personally feel itās too much of the fancy stuff when a shot will suffice, scoring before half time was key and then jumping on them in the second half.
As for Kane Iām still not totally sure, theyāve at times played better without him.
I really like him and his ethics and I really thought Chelski would go for him instead of Touchall
Yo FGā¦
Chelsea donāt have any ethics, so they wonāt recognise them in Nuno :0)
Interesting and probably late to be honest considering rugby has had concussion protocols in place for years. Not that they are brilliant but at least they are trying to address the issue while football is kind of
ānah, not a problemā