Lol…
2 Likes
4 Likes
While I´m waiting for the next “accident” to happen, I really want to believe that. At least for today. Please don´t tell me otherwise 
The United States should send them a note in reply asking them to stop invading their neighbours…
2 Likes
Bryansk isn’t really a mystery. Some of the other fires, deep into Russia far more mysterious. I wonder if this guy even looked at a map, noticed where Bryansk was (right next to Ukraine in range of many Ukrainian systems), and read the multiple reports of drones and Tocha’s being involved.
This will make reinforcing eastern and southern Ukraine more difficult. I wonder why the Russians waited so long before bombing these targets.
1 Like
So fucking slow, as if war is a situation where one waits for months to see how it develops. Pisses me off tbh.
1 Like
WOW !!!
Need to see more sources if this is true, but Archer together with French Ceasar, regarded as best and most sophisticated artillery in the world. It beats the Panzerhaubitze 2000 on some parameters and regarded as better in several types of terrain and more.
Therefore, a large dose of salt needed imo. Because this transfer would be, as the Americans say, Yuuuge !
I’ve a question, mate. Isn’t it dangerous to let modern armament like that go to Eastern Ukraine? Imagine if the troops there are finally encircled and then forced to hand over all these nice toys to the Russian forces…
I don’t know why exactly, but I have internal alarm bells ringing… I’d probably prefer if the most modern armament stays within NATO borders (or at least in Western Ukraine), just to make sure that there are no more unpleasant surprises… maybe it’s a too defensive view?
Also, if the contrary happens, and the Ukrainians start to drive out the Russians thanks to that armament, won’t they be at heightened risk of being targeted with chemical weapons or battlefield nukes?
Sure, some can be captured, but its not nuclear bomb technology this, but artillery pieces. In war, some will always be captured. Efficiency on the battlefield more important. And what is the Russians supposed to do with 1 or 2 pieces of artillery that uses 155 mm ammo anyway ? They use different ammunition.
I think your view is too defensive, yes. Russia also has Abrams tanks. They don’t produce them even so.
3 Likes