This is what I feared when we signed Mo to such a huge wage, we blew out our wage structure and now all the top players will want 300k/wk+++
Before we capped out at 225-250k
If we are successful it is fine. However when you donāt then we hit a buffer the TIA post above explains it better.
We also spent a fair bit that summer including a straight release clause deal for Dom. Effectively itās why we didnāt do much last summer
2 Likes
We blew out the wage structureā¦ but again, I believe it was necessary to keep a player of Moās caliber and to keep the club competitive and to climb back to the Champions League.
And while a Ā£57M loss canāt be overlooked, we have also been relatively conservative with our spending over the years that we can still absorb this loss for now. And I believe we should continue to be prudent although that might mean the loss of a few players who might choose to go elsewhere for more money (i.e., not giving players whatever they want).
On the flip side, the unsustainability of some of the other clubs in the PL makes me wonder whether there will be another Leeds in the next few years.
2 Likes
Does anyone know if this loss has something to do with the costs of the ARE expansion? It didnāt go very well towards the end, the end of the construction work was delayed and the company went bankrupt.
Regardless it has a lot to do with no CL. Thats going be more inflated over time and the fact we did spend a fair bit yes we recouped but the expenditure upfront on a release clause wonāt help.
Iām not sure when bonuses come into play but if you arenāt playing champions league but the players are achieving as they did the following year bonuses will be accrued on that. I think it does explain why we wouldnāt be massively spending last summer and also why these contracts have taken so long.
My concern isnāt for us also didnāt we lose many months on that being open for that season so we will have lost revenue there too.
It is for other clubs who seem to have a similar spending pattern and yet never even get near Europe.
Good initiative Iāve benefited from this at times including the LFC 4-3 a few seasons ago against Man City.
3 Likes
For all the prudence and record revenues and the strongest PL brand, we have only one season that recorded a pre tax profit in the last 5 years, I think. And that for an a small amount of 7mil.
This is the reality for those who lament the stingy owners. Do we really be a club that is beholden to the owners whims and fancies or a club that is trying to be self sustaining.
2 Likes
Considering how much they have re-imvested into the club infrastructure, am surprised the losses are that low and the debt that low.
Main stand 114mil
ARE stand 80mil
Kirkby 50mil
Melwood (net) 3mil (sold for 10, rebuy for 13)
Thatās 250mil they have spent in a decade, above/beyond normal operating costs.
8 Likes
Our wages are on the higher side. And usually increase with performance based incentives kicking in.
1 Like
Infrastructure cost donāt count towards fair play? or has that change or never been the case?
1 Like
This isnāt about Fair Play though is, this is the clubs annual accounts.
1 Like
Here is the Swiss ramble analysis
The main points are 1) broadcasting revenue down (largely because we werenāt in the CL for the period these accounts cover 2) the wage bill and operating costs went up 3) book money lost through player amortisation.
Not great, but nothing much to worry about.
2 Likes
Every time I see that word, I think of ARD.
I hope heās well, wherever he is.
7 Likes
Fond memories of his accounting work to try and prove we could afford both Salah and Mbappe.
2 Likes
Taps the signā¦
ā¦because NIKE were going to pay for Mbappe so we didnt have to.
3 Likes
Should we even have American owners nowadays? Isnāt it basically the same as Russians?
4 Likes
Have any of the FSG had any involvement in politics? Iām not going to hate on someone merely through association.
1 Like
Was tongue in cheek Whips 
2 Likes
Yeah, it was more of a genuine question. They seem happy to avoid the spotlight, so I was wondering if that is also something that they avoid.
They seem to, and itās probably wise. They get enough grief from Red Sox fans as it is.
Mind you Iām not sure how comfortable Iād be with Russian owners and the lines are certainly blurring.
2 Likes