(It’s the largest ever)
1 Like
1 Like
1 Like
Yes, there are such indications, but it is still hard to say for sure.
If you don’t know where this is on a map, then I zoomed a bit out for you
2 Likes
Big Day !
And!
2 Likes
Also a minor mechanised offensive has been vanquished before it began
Minor stuff elsewhere
2 Likes
A critical view of tonight’s successful strike in the Baltic Sea. Because there are dangers. I support this, but it would be dishonest of me to not reveal that there are issues…
To understand the issues, please read these two posts carefully. I will speak no further of it right now, but I very much would like to inform. So you should know this.
Ukraine does what it thinks it needs to do since it finds itself in an Existential War, sometimes it is not necessarily something you would like if you were a neighbouring state not at war. That is the truth.
1 Like
I’m struggling with traduction here Magnus.
What language is it? Not sure that will help me?
Problem might be that I don’t use social media apps, it might work better on computer than Android phone.
1 Like
Polish. A moment, Twitter has auto translate you can click so I assumed it was not problematic.
Here it is. Post 1 from March 24
Will Russian drones once again enter Polish airspace? Echoes of the latest Ukrainian drone attack on the oil terminal in Primorsk.
On the night of March 22-23, 2026, around 04:00 local time, long-range Ukrainian strike drones FP-1 successfully attacked the oil terminal in Primorsk in the Leningrad Oblast. Satellite images published the next day by Ukrainian Radio Svoboda revealed the destruction of 4 large oil storage tanks. As a result of the attack, Russian authorities suspended operations at the terminal. At the same time, on Russian Telegram channels, on the morning of March 23, information began to spread that the drone attack on Primorsk was effective because it came from the direction of the Gulf of Finland. The FP-1 drones thus bypassed the strong Russian EW barrier created around Pskov, Luga, and St. Petersburg.
In the afternoon of March 23, the Lithuanian Armed Forces reported an unidentified drone that, around 03:00 local time that day, crashed into the frozen surface of Lake Lavysas in the Orany district. Although Lithuanian military radars did not register this object, they suspect it flew in from Belarus. Journalists from the local LRT portal then obtained footage (below) from surveillance in the nearby village of Ziurai, which proved it was a strike drone equipped with a full warhead, though of smaller mass than those found in Russian Shaheds. Then, this morning, the head of the Lithuanian Ministry of National Defense, Robertas Kaunas, stated that the crashed drone was likely Ukrainian. He immediately added that it had probably gone astray as a result of electronic warfare measures.
I recall that a similar situation occurred on August 24, 2025. Several hours after the nighttime Ukrainian drone attack on oil terminals in Ust-Luga and Primorsk, a crashed Ukrainian strike drone was found in Estonia’s Koruste, 36 km southwest of Tartu. At that time, Estonian authorities, after discussions with representatives of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, also began explaining the incident as the drone “going astray” due to Russian EW actions, although it likely flew in from Latvian territory.
The Russian side has long claimed that Ukraine uses NATO airspace in attacks on Baltic oil terminals. In my opinion, it was no coincidence that two weeks after the August 2025 events, Russia—in a kind of retaliation—used the airspace of a NATO country (in this case, Poland) to carry out an early morning attack on September 10, 2025, on the Lviv and Volyn oblasts in Ukraine. As part of it, several dozen Gerbera-type decoy drones flew in from Belarusian territory, most of which fell in the Lublin Voivodeship. As well as a few Shaheds with warheads, which then veered southeast, re-entered Ukrainian airspace, and attacked targets in Volyn Oblast. Are we facing a repeat of that situation in the near future? We’ll find out soon.
Footage from local surveillance showing the Ukrainian drone strike in the Lake Lavysas area in Lithuania early on the morning of March 23, 2026
1 Like
Post 2 of March 25th
Another Ukrainian strike drone attack on targets in Leningrad Oblast using NATO airspace.
Last night, Ukrainian drones once again used the airspace of the Baltic states to attack the Ust-Luga oil terminal and other targets in Leningrad Oblast. This is not about the Ukrainian drones that entered Estonian and Latvian airspace from the Russian side last night and crashed on their territory. Those likely veered off course due to the use of countermeasures (EW) against them. Yesterday, however, there were other incidents in NATO airspace involving, as all indications suggest, long-range Ukrainian strike drones.
In the morning, the deputy chief of staff of the Latvian National Armed Forces (NBS) for operations, Brigadier General Egils Leščinskis, reported that last night—still before the incident with the Ukrainian drone crashing near the village of Kraslava—an object was detected entering Latvian airspace from the Belarusian side, which then turned and entered Russian airspace. At the same time, Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur reported that unidentified drones also violated NATO airspace over the Gulf of Finland that night, forcing alliance fighters from Baltic Air Policing to scramble.
In summary, the information currently being provided by news stations about the supposedly accidental incursion of Ukrainian drones into NATO airspace is nonsense for idiots designed to cover up the actions of the Ukrainian authorities. In reality, they are once again presenting their allies with faits accomplis and exposing their citizens to risks associated with the flight of aerial objects with 30-40 kg explosive payloads over their heads. The actions of the Ukrainian authorities are an obvious step toward escalating the conflict. Russia can now retaliate and attack Ukraine via the territories of Poland or Romania, just as happened in September 2025 in Lublin Voivodeship. It is not impossible that such a Russian reaction is the main goal of the Ukrainian authorities’ actions.
Below—vehicles and personnel of the Latvian Armed Forces seen at the crash site of a Ukrainian strike drone near Kraslava.
1 Like
Ahh! When I tell the page the correct language it works. Thanks Magnus.
Often the original language is automatically identified if it’s not I just get traduire français to anglais and only bits and pieces get translated. Which makes understanding even more difficult 
.
1 Like
I get that. I find that, extremely ironically I want to add (because Twitter has all the other issues we all know and discuss), Twitter’s auto translation is lightyears better than Google Translate. If you read the text above, it sounds like actual technical information. Had it been Google Translate, you would get lots of very strange wordings 
1 Like
1 Like
But it can not identify languages you have to know what language the original text is in .
1 Like
Oooo boy.
(it is reposted everywhere on twitter, but moklasen and some others are not 100 % sure it is not exaggerated by AI at current). I am posting the picture regardless, with a warning that it could be maybe have been manipulated, but some of the best people who detect such manipulation are not sure.
1 Like
Absolute insane
Hehe
3 Likes
Just a curiosity
And a lucky Ukrainian
1 Like
1 Like
And Trump is now demanding that Ukraine basically surrender. Zelensky’s reply should consist of two words. The first begins with an F and the second with an O.
Edit: Thanks to Magnus again for giving us information and insight that we don’t find anywhere else. 
7 Likes