And the UK with it. You can do a hell of a lot of damage in 2 years especially with her views on the economy.
I get the feeling that Sunak would appeal more to traditional Tory voter if he got in, and would be more competent at hiding the havoc he’d wreak on public services. Truss would just be the nuclear alternative and there’s no hiding that. I do think Truss may appeal to the extreme loony Brexiteer bunch more though, despite her being a convert.
I suppose if believe that both choices are going to lead to a lot of damage, then one would prefer the more damaging to the party that votes them in, probably…
The only difference being that ‘traditional’ tories will believe the damage was worth it with Sunak along with a large portion of the voting public.
Just because Truss would make it blatantly obvious doesn’t mean the other would be better, far from it imo!
The Conservative Party believe that people are genuinely thick enough to be too distracted by a non-existent ‘culture war’ to think about the fact that they can’t afford to feed their children or gear their homes. It’s up to people to show that they aren’t.
Still too many out there to either ignore the obvious, or be oblivious to it sadly. Many are happy to live in a bible inflated by the Daily Mail, Express or Telegraph rather than one filled with oxygen.
There’s a lot in this. A proper tangled web with what is supposedly a shining beacon of UK manufacturing. Peerages and all sorts in this one and of course, gues who? Boris.
Another Johnson special. Hopefully, it won’t happen.
Key passage from the article
Johnson, who will create more peers in the autumn in a resignation honours list, has already appointed 86 peers, bringing the number of members sitting in the Lords to more than 800.
The fat blubbering idiot has created over 10% of all lords already.