Its easy for young (male) readers to empathise with a young, pretty woman than if it was some old, crusty man with facial warts. Its absolutely no coincidence the BBC chose this person. Along with the heading, we know where the BBC’s position on this issue is.
Family watches I’m a twat make me eat bugs in the jungle for a big pile of cash. I drift in and out doing jobs. Hancock turns up for £400k. Should be sacked and arrested tomorrow.
The strategy of continually bringing up Jeremy Corbyn looks to me like an own goal for the Tories.
Bringing it up constantly surely just reinforces the fact that Corbyn is no longer leader of the Labour party - which in the eyes of the voters would surely be a positive for Labour, making them more electable.
The threat, Corbyn and his supporters still exist and he could get in by a back door like Truss and Sunak. Or Starmer might be Corbyn’s puppet, who knows?
On a related issue - does anyone see the point of PMQs anymore?
It has descended into soundbite party political broadcasts. Questions are rarely answered - if they are, every answer is somehow linked to Ukraine or Covid.
For ‘to tackle labour shortages’ read ‘to tackle rising wage demands’.
Economic immigration has many angles, the fact a twat that runs a retail outlet has to mention rotting crops, or for that matter abbatoirs without workers to kill pigs for pork pies just goes to show what an big twat he is.
It’s beyond pointless. First a tory backbencher asking if the PM will join her in congratulating one of her constituents on being a lollipop lady for 30 years, which of course the PM will.
Then Keir unleashing a hilariously witty soundbite about the latest Tory scandal - which the PM will retort with something about Corbyn or a lie about the 40 new hospitals they’ve buit which will go unchallenged.
Then that SNP guy tells the PM his constituents think he/she is a nobhead.
And then as you say, just answer every remaining questions with something about Ukraine or Covid.