Agree with what? The literal words of a character? Never hung somebody twice is really quite simplistic.
If you read the statement from the prison service they seem to be saying that they assess risk on a case-by-case basis.The FM was reporting based on what the prison service had told her.
I expect these cases come up every so often whereby the prison service isnât really set up to deal with a particular case. I seem to remember that the Lockerbie bomber had to be kept in special facilities for obviously different reasons.
Please elaborate.
Over a pint preferably
That seems to be the message in the BBC article on it along with the fact that they would not be incarcerated in Corton Vale.
Each is risk assessed which makes sense to me.
Back to the biannual debate about who should be shot
Back to the rotten bunch of crooks that are responsible to governing the UK.
At best Zahawi was considered careless by HMRC. Righto
This makes sense to me.
What doesnât make sense to me is again the blanket statement that no rapists are held in womenâs prisons, nor the treatment of Brysonâs case if they were already being held in Cornton Vale.
The blanket statement does not square with the âcase-by-case basisâ, nor the holding of rapists in mensâ prisons.
If a gay man rapes men, should he be sent to a male of female prison?
Should be shot.
Next, weâve got a whole tribunal to get through, itâs a long list.
Think thereâs one thing everyone will agree on, the criminal justice system in the UK is far too lenient.
Not necessarily. They get assessed and sent to the most appropriate place.
Nadhim Zahawi did not make âinnocent errorâ with his tax, HMRC chief suggests - live updates (telegraph.co.uk)
Nadhim Zahawi did not make âinnocent errorâ with his tax, HMRC chief suggests
Does it make me a Mao loving Marxist?
WTF on the same page - government is paying ÂŁ222k in legal fees for Boris Johnson partygate defense.
Piss well and truly boiledâŚ
What do you expect Boris to do?
Borrow the money and pay for it himselfâŚ
I disagree that itâs too lenient. I do think however that it doesnât have very good rehabilitation outcomes, the last I checked.
The question is, what is the goal of your criminal justice system?
Fuck all.
As usual.
You missed my punchline
âLenientâ is a funny word in this context.
I certainly believe that we send too many people to prison and for too less a crime. I would reserve prison exclusively for those who are assessed to be a serious danger to the public. For everyone else community based rehabilitation and public service. Iâd take a chunk of the millions that would be saved every year and invest it back into crime prevention projects and poverty alleviation.
Some would say thatâs too lenient. Iâd say letâs stop throwing our money and peoples lives away on something that doesnât work. Letâs try something that does.
Nope, thatâs the beauty of fiction.
Wondered what would finally get my finger out and write a bookâŚâŚ