Iām pretty sure Iāve read more than ten, but my mate was going out with his daughter for a bit, and had dinner with Terry P on a handful of occasions.
Iām not talking about them, I was quite specific. Iāll be laser straight then. You walk into my place of work and murder me in cold blood. Thereās CCTV footage and 5 witnesses. When the police arrive your statement is āIām glad I killed the Tory bastardā
Youāre 100% guilty, you admit it, witnesses saw it and the court can see the footage. Then can we put you in a chair that certainly isnāt PAT tested?
Thereās plenty of cases of people going to jail for a crime, being ārehabilitatedā with some prison time and going back to that same lifestyle. pick your poison.
Murderer gets out of jail, kills another innocent. how is that any different than the risk of sentencing an innocent. Where is the risk higher?
Itās a hypothetical, but donāt forget who issues the verdict. itās by peers, not by judge. the jury of peers must approve of the death sentence, and under strict guidelines of consideration. to prevent such an instance
there is no group of peers who pass judgement on the victim of murder.
All signs of societyās current trajectory point towards a failure of the justice systemās accountability to the whole, which is being waylaid to the rights of the criminal?