I’ve noticed that people who argue for a tax system based on what they use, always without fail, wildly underestimate what they use. A good example is education. I was got into an argument with someone who was absolutely adamant that his taxes should not fund education, as he didn’t have children and felt he shouldn’t be paying for other people’s children to be educated.
I had to point out that as a business owner he certainly did benefit from education, and he might want to consider how his business would fare if he had to run it with employees who couldn’t read or write.