UK Politics Thread (Part 3)

No thanks too many lefty BBC vegans :joy:

1 Like

That’s absolute demonstrable bollocks and you well know it but you won’t admit it because you don’t like it.

1 Like

Ain’t that the fucking truth. Like living in North Korea’s seriously communist side.

So let’s do this. @Mascot I think we know you never smacked your kids. Are they well behaved now? Did you watch as they reached up and burnt themselves on the kettle and with a strong but firm voice say “Don’t do that?” Or did you think fuck it and let them burn themselves? First time jnr used a glue gun I did the warning and later applied the gallons of cold water. But then you don’t give a glue gun to a toddler as you should be too busy teaching them to behave without hitting them. Bet you don’t answer honestly.

We’re back in Demolition Man.

Can’t resist. You do know that a few decades ago was the height of your political allegiances powers don’t you?

While the Conservatives were fighting alongside the feminists, I suppose?

2 Likes

You might be a prick by your own definition but I’ve never EVER lost my temper with my child. Never needed to. I’m not a shit parent.

throws the ball up and waits for somebody to smack it into their own face.

No, it’s not a quote. It’s intentionally bastardising what I posted. There’s a fucking surprise.

You can say it’s bollocks all you like, but it’s true.

Decades ago it was common that men hit their wives. And it would be justified as ‘just when they deserve it’, ‘when they need a short, sharp shock’, ‘as long it isn’t excessive and out of control’

Exactly the same arguments that are used to justify hitting children.

Here is the charming Sean Connery justifying when it’s permissible to hit a women. All the same platitudes. Only use an open hand. Only as a last resort. Only when she won’t shut up. Etc.

There were a lot of Sean Connery’s around in the seventies. My Grandad was one. Liked to give Grandma a little clip every now and then, just when she stepped out of line. Never out of control or in anger. Until the day he went at her with an iron so hard he nearly killed her and she ended up in hospital.

NOT A FEW FUCKING DECADES AGO IS IT???

For fuck’s SAKE! It’s 2023!!! You’re banging on about 50 sodding years ago. And you even posted a video that proved you wrong. #achievement

Ghandi hit his wife apparently

Well, you’ve already decided what you think so there doesn’t seem much point really.

1 Like

What does it matter? I’m say a few decade and you are saying fifty years. Is that the level of semantics we’re going for.

The point is that people would use the same arguments to justify hitting their spouses and people use today to justify hitting the kids. That’s just fucking true, as much as you don’t want it to be.

Go back centuries and you’ve got Slave owner trying to justify hitting their slave by claiming it’s only when they step our of line, and for their own good really.

1 Like

A critical reappraisal of Ghandi is overdue. He was no saint.

Could be true, remember hearing mother Theresa was a bit of a cow

Christ, don’t start on Mother Theresa or you’ll have me and @klopptomist finding common ground!

Was she from Warrington?

A few = 5 seemingly. “Dad, can I have a few pounds please?” never in the history of mankind (HA) equated to £5

Being a parent is a bit like driving. Everyone thinks they are great and it’s everyone else that’s the problem.

But here you are, on a public forum, proudly admitting and evangelising the righteousness of hitting a child, in defiance of the mountain of evidence that’s it’s harmful in a variety of ways, as well as being totally ineffective.

3 Likes

The ghoul of Calcutta? Think Hitch knew he was going way off the board there. Can you tell I respect him?

:joy::joy::joy:

1 Like