I suppse its feasible that someone wearing an anti landmine suit stepping on dogshit might have an argument
Or the dog had been eating nitroglycerin?
What if the dog had shat on the landmine?
Really messy outcome
Reminds me of a robotic lawnmower that I saw advertised on Amazon. There is a section at the bottom where potential purchasers can ask questions from other owners.
One question asked, āWhat happens if the robotic mower runs over dog poo?ā
Top answer, āBad, bad things.ā
Something like what has happened to this thread.
If ya think standing in dog shit is grossā¦ Its nothing compared to standing in Fox shit - Smell is 100times worse times tenā¦!
Everyday is a school day on here eh :0)
Much appreciated.
Iāve had a whippet roll in the stuff. Iām still waiting for a washing machine to come with a āWoollens and Whippetsā option. Iām told that in the US with skunks you simply take the dog down to the pound for a fortnight.
Anyway, UK politics. Foxshit: I blame Starmer!
My dog loves to roll in fox shit, badger shit, dead birds, dead fish, anything that stinks actually. She rolls in it then looks you dead in the eye with a look of complete satisfaction.
That changes pretty quick when she susses that a bath is coming.
Iād forgotten how rancid young puppy shit smells until just recently
Watching Fox News is even worse
It is definitely not as widely taken compared to people in the west as I can see.
swing and a missā¦
Bollocks is what I see alot in this forum written by people like you but itās just that I am not so overly eager to be right like you are on the internet.
To be fair, I wasnāt the only one who didnāt have a fucking clue what you were on about. Why on Earth are you talking about fucking pronouns?
I definitely donāt understand what is going on in UK Politics
Compared to over the pond, sanity and organisation
The Labour government is rabidly left wing/pathetically moderate depending on your point of view. The Tories are becoming ever more extreme, will probably end up calling themselves MABA.
I completely agree with these points and have mentioned it a few times regarding the Budget and Labour having to make tough calls, which they potentially could not foresee until in power.
However, in the same sentence how the public judge these decisions come down to political alignment.
I am aware of your political stance and I respect you for that. But, I think you are guilty of exactly the same thing as what you are suggesting. We all are to a degree, some more so than others.
So, the Leave campaign was full of lies, maybe so, but so was the Remain campaign. Going on your post (first two quotes), is it wrong to suggest that the Leave campaign, could not follow through on some of its āLiesā because they were unable to do what they wanted to, because of what they were dealing with? The position they found themselves in?
Strong opposition by the public, getting it voted through parliament and in agreement with the EU. Surely, that follows your logic.
Is it wrong to suggest that after Brexit, the Remains ācontinual assertionsā of needing an Emergency budget, the House Market crashing, unemployment rising by 500,000, a mass exodus from London by the Financial sector, big Car manufacturers leaving the UK, etc could have been lies?
Are you including yourself in that statement or just everyone who disagreeās with you?