UK Politics Thread (Part 5)

Not withstanding the wisdom of you resurrecting a heated discussion days after it had cooled off your idea that Jaffod got his facts wrong, apologised, but I still went after him like a terrier is a total mischaracterisation of the debate. And it matters because it’s a microcosm of the immigration debate.

First of all Jaffod did not track back and acknowledge his error. He admitted he was wrong, in the most grudgingly dismissive of ways while continuing to insist that he was broadly correct in his assertions, and those trivialities didn’t really matter. As shown below.

The second of those is particularly special, suggesting that I’m a prick for pointing out that immigrants don’t get free mobile phones - such a trope at this point it’s almost parody.

My arguments here with Jaffod are a microcosm of the immigration debate, and discussions like this always follow the same pattern. Person A makes claim about immigration. Person A is told that it isn’t true by Person B. Person A then whines that they are entitled to their opinion, claims to have seen immigration going wrong with their own eyes, and that Person B is a bully for pointing it out.

Throughout the discussion Jaffod put down a manifesto for all the ways he would tackle immigration, which is where the stuff on mobile phone, free cigs and driving lessons came from, but also declarations on denying access to healthcare, what do with people turning up undocumented etc. It was pointed out to him (not just by me) that everything he wrote was either completely untrue, already happening to some degree, or completely practically unworkable. Has this changed his opinion? I doubt it.

The frustrating thing about the immigration debate is that people are so misinformed and confused by a deliberate media agenda on immigration that they no longer seem particularly impacted by discovering the information they are basing their opinion on is not true. People are reflexing entirely on a gut feeling, and sense of general unease and dissatisfaction which is probably attributable to more factors that seeing more immigrants in their community.

Where we are right now is that it seems that for most people the issue they care most about is immigration, to the point where we are at risk of electing a government with a extreme neoliberal economic agenda, and their feelings on immigration, and specifically the grievance of the situation being unfair, are almost always based on things that aren’t true. That seems to me worthy of pushing back on when it crops up.

3 Likes

Do you mean illegally or irregularly? Illegally would be a false or falsely claimed visa. Irregularly would be someone who arrived without paperwork (or just UNHCR documentation) and claimed asylum at the border.

Chances are, someone who has shown up and claimed asylum on day one is more likely to be genuine compared to someone who has overrun a visa and doesn’t want to go home.

All of these cases are why we have an asylum system. It’s up to the government to ensure that it works smoothly.

3 Likes

[quote=“Lynch04, post:1751, topic:5783”]
I think I actually saw a statistic that people entering the country illegally were more likely to have their application accepted. [/quote]

I sounds semantic, but there is a reason why people entering the country by irregular means are being described as illegals immigrants.

There are very, very few illegal immigrants in the country. An illegal immigrant would be someone who is in the country with no visa, no leave to remain, and is probably evading the authorities in order to stay in the country. Obviously those people are removed when caught.

Everyone else has permanent or temporary leave to remain. They are not illegal.

Thanks Lynch, but you’ve probably already noticed you’re wasting your time. When someone displays the levels of arrogance and conceit this bloke does it doesn’t really matter how many people call him on it.
I asked him not to quote me anymore yet here we are, 2 days later, and he’s quoting me in response to another person’s post in the insane desire to be RIGHT.
He’s even done the very thing I accused him of and which he flatly refuses to admit. He’s taken a throwaway line I used about winning the internet to imply I’m labelling him a prick. If I WANTED to call him a prick I would have done.

And that’s what he does. Misrepresents what is said. Conflates what is said. Distorts what is said. Implies you’ve said something you haven’t. Paraphrases you incorrectly. I highlighted a number of instances where he’d done these exact things and when asked to admit it his response was “Not a chance”.
He rounds a load of rambling waffle off by resorting to his default position, the idea everyone who disagrees with him are misinformed and confused. Oh, if only the rest of us had his insight and intuition.

1 Like

Hmmm… in a world in which media landscape is parted into left-leaning and right-leaning newspapers, like until the early 2000s, I’d fully agree with you.

Nowadays, how is the situation in England? Most newspapers and media outlets have been bought by billionaires and are conditioning the masses to their neoliberal agenda (s*n, telegraph, daily fail and so on).

Who is on the other side of the fence? Who manipulates the lefties then? The Guardian possibly, as it still is an independent newspaper? What else? The bbc is state-controlled to a point, not by a billionaire, so should grant some factual information. Whom else?

This is a genuine question, I don’t know the situation in England with the media very well.

1 Like

Yeah that´s the point I see made often. On the face of it it´s logical.Though the right wing thinks the Telegraph is left wing for example and chanels like LBC.

Just on that, are we calling neoliberal the centre?

I guess the counter question is where do the Left get their media? And there is your answer. They have to get it somewhere.

I didn´t necessarily mean the ´print´ media or TV. Even Tiktok or whatever shite they use (ok i do have an account)

Come on. The argument was over until @lynch resurrected it. I’m not going to just ignore someone directly accusing me of something I haven’t done.

There is a list of left leaning publications here:

There are some fairly solid ones there (Guardian and Byline are pretty sound journalism) but also a lot of dross.

That’s probably true of most politically based journalism. You have to see whether they separate reporting from opinion. Bad journalism too often passes off opinion as fact.

I’ve been using this restaurant for years, can’t say I’ve noticed a high turnover of staff, the same blokes have been serving us for as long as I can remember

https://www.thenational.scot/news/26473271.st-andrews-restaurant-boss-hits-back-zia-yusufs-visa-claim/

1 Like

how on earth do you conclude that by writing “if you want to claim you’ve won the internet” Jaffod was suggesting you’re a prick??

AI Overview

“You won the internet” is an online slang phrase used to praise a post, comment, or video that is so clever, funny, or spot-on that it beats all other content online for that day. It is a playful exaggeration, not a real prize. [[(You Win The Internet - What does it mean?)]

never stop been you…

1 Like

Quite a few there but that´s just publications.

I am talking about any media really.

1 Like

YouTube?

X?

Tik-Tok?

Mascot? :wink:

I’m sorry. I’m sure he was being kind. :roll_eyes:

Look. The point is that Jaffod was all over the fucking place in that exchange. He’s claimed he admitted he was wrong, but if he did it with such a lack of grace and humility, passive aggression, and contempt.

But I’m the one being unreasonable because I called him out on it? Bullshit.

The irony is that I think we’d both fucking moved on from this until others decided to resurrect it a week later.

1 Like

he’s not the only poster on here that ‘is all over the fucking place’ in exchanges with you…

Sorry - hit send before I was ready. The forum is really playing up for me today.

I suspect a lot of political media is the whole blog /vlog arena. And that really is the wild west.

1 Like

Here he comes…

1 Like

“Well done on winning the internet.”

“Who are you calling a prick?”

Only one person all over the place on here.

I’m sorry. I read that as a passive aggressive dig at me. I had no idea you were so impressed at the quality of my post you literally thought I’d win the internet. Fair enough.

Still I see the not engaging with me is going well :+1:

Would a poll be…

  • In order
  • Frowned upon
  • Shut down
  • Resulting in warnings
  • Resulting in bans
  • Provoking feet stamping