- Bantz
- Pranks
- Love 'em both
- They’re both shite
0
voters
Yes, they have always existed but they are becoming more of an excuse for stupid, antisocial behaviour these days
Which one do you hate more?
2 Likes
Which one’s a std? Bantz sounds itchy.
8 Likes
They’re both shite and this thread is a prime example.
Korma, korma, timezones
Where’s the… money John?
Cynnie is very old and something about pot noodles.
1 Like
Given that there are 4 voting options, the question, if presented correctly, should have read “Which is worst?”
1 Like
When he starts to lose his sense of grammar you know that poor @cynicaloldgit is well down the dementia route.
1 Like
Wrong. 
1 Like
That’ll learn you not to take on grammatical cynical
Shit bugger arse…
1 Like
It’s a fight i could never win against someone who argued 13,000 is “a few” 
It’s only grammar my dear. Don’t take it so seriously…
So he technacilly is correct.
Compared to 70K, 15K is a few
Sorry…wrong thread…oops a daisy…
1 Like
Great logic.
Dunfermline population, 58k.
My home town population, a few.
WTF is Bantz?
Humour went down the toilet long ago. It used to bé funny watching someone fuck up (like walk into a lampe post). Now people only laugh at nasty pranks where someone is tricked or forced into fucking up. It’s nasty stupid and dangerous not funny.
1 Like
Short for Banter.
Jocular tit for tat.
Opportunity to be offended
Interesting that nobody loves them according to this vote, yet…