Which is worse?

  • Bantz
  • Pranks
  • Love 'em both
  • They’re both shite
0 voters

Yes, they have always existed but they are becoming more of an excuse for stupid, antisocial behaviour these days

Which one do you hate more?

2 Likes

Which one’s a std? Bantz sounds itchy.

8 Likes

They’re both shite and this thread is a prime example.

Korma, korma, timezones
Where’s the… money John?
Cynnie is very old and something about pot noodles.

1 Like

Given that there are 4 voting options, the question, if presented correctly, should have read “Which is worst?”

1 Like

When he starts to lose his sense of grammar you know that poor @cynicaloldgit is well down the dementia route.

1 Like

Wrong. :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:

1 Like

That’ll learn you not to take on grammatical cynical

Shit bugger arse…

1 Like

It’s a fight i could never win against someone who argued 13,000 is “a few” :rofl:

It’s only grammar my dear. Don’t take it so seriously…

Screenshot 2025-02-08 144312

So he technacilly is correct.

Compared to 70K, 15K is a few

Sorry…wrong thread…oops a daisy…

1 Like

Great logic.
Dunfermline population, 58k.
My home town population, a few.

WTF is Bantz?
Humour went down the toilet long ago. It used to bé funny watching someone fuck up (like walk into a lampe post). Now people only laugh at nasty pranks where someone is tricked or forced into fucking up. It’s nasty stupid and dangerous not funny.

1 Like

Short for Banter.

Jocular tit for tat.

Opportunity to be offended

Interesting that nobody loves them according to this vote, yet…