Al-Sandcastle - the sportswashing barcodes

3 Likes

they wont, will sell them at cents on a $. money/losses are not an issue for them. their plan is to build a super team as quickly as possible

1 Like

exactly this…they will literally give them away for free

3 Likes

Are you saying if this mob purchased LFC you and everyone on here would walk away? I’m calling BS…

1 Like

I would yes,100%.

4 Likes

Just on initial reactions it looks like 50% or so would walk away. Personally, I’d be much less committed to the club.

4 Likes

Not everyone is saying they would walk away but those that are, including myself, would until ownership changed. No need to be dismissive of that view because you can’t, don’t, or won’t feel the moral qualms that we do. Have a word.

7 Likes

I think I was the first one to say I would walk away.

I‘m investing around €600 a year for Sky and DAZN to watch all our games. I would surely end my subscriptions.

More importantly I would stop investing so much time watching ALL our games, following news and being here on TAN.

I would probably watch a game here and there and follow a bit of news and surely wouldn’t spent so much time here anymore.

7 Likes

I’d walk away too, or at least reduce my ‘support’ to the level of a just a passing interest.

In the past I used to like Newcastle and its fans. I felt that there was a working class affinity between us. But once they started with all that ‘sign on’ and ‘bin dippers’ bullshit, then I was done with them and took pleasure in seeing them suffer under Ashley.

They’re really showing their true colors now. All they care about is football at the expense of any moral considerations. They epitomize the southerners’ idea of stupid northern thickos. Hope they do get relegated this season, but unfortunately they’d bounce right back with all that money behind them.

2 Likes

I don’t think I would walk away, tbh. I would hate our owners, but I would do some sort of mental gymnastics to still watch the footy and support the reds. Deep down I know it wouldn’t be the same, but I would probably still support the boys. Not the owners, mind. And that’s the split I would do in my mind. Probably.

As it’s all hypothetical.

2 Likes

Bit harsh suggesting I would have no moral qualms - I never said that. I hate everything about what this Bin dude represents. But I would never walk away from LFC whatever the circumstances which seems to be in the minority over this hyperthetical. That’s fine everyone has a view.

Guaranteed no Newcastle supporters are walking away and the whole point was the hypocrisy of the situation.

2 Likes

All 19 clubs? So even Man City and Chelsea have complained? The reason mentioned below is bit too ironic. If the reason was the regime itself, it was a different story. Still Man city shouldn’t be the ones complaining no matter what.

The arrival of a new set of billionaire owners is bound to have upset clubs who see on the horizon a far more competitive Newcastle and the prospect of St James’ Park wealth inflating transfer fees and wages

The time to complain was couple of decades back. Doubt anything will change now.

6 Likes

“And there are others still (Newcastle fans) — the ones in the thobes, the ones with the Saudi flag in their social media avatars, the ones who have issued scrawls of abuse to Khashoggi’s widow for daring to challenge the morality of the takeover — who are perfectly happy to embrace it, to do precisely what the Saudis want them to do.”

Please let them get relegated.

8 Likes

You have to laugh at the PL’s “fit and proper” test. It doesn’t matter if the prospective buyer is financially insolvent or a multi-billionaire; a benevolent benefactor or the reincarnation of Hitler and Stalin. God forbid he messes in any way with the broadcasting rights though.

3 Likes

There quite honestly couldn’t be a single worse person on the entire planet who should be put in charge of a PL football club than that smirking murderous POS.

3 Likes

Pretty good read thiz.

3 Likes

He shouldn’t be there in any position of power.

Yes over a certain period… but Newcastle have been running at a profit ever since Ashley took over

1 Like

Saw a story earlier that he’s now looking at Derby.

I think judging by the messages so far, it seems like they want to take the City approach. Long term, building up the club, not only personnel but putting money into structure and infrastructure (and boy do they need it, plenty reports of their training ground simply not being up to the standard of a PL club).

But… early messages are always like that, I guess. What else do you say other than we’re gonna take this calm and collected, not doing crazy things, etc. One thing I’m 100% sure if that it’s certainly not as fans imagine and it will also take time. I’m pretty sure IF they ever get to a level of competing or winning the league, there will be quite a ton of players who they initially bought in early years who will not be there anymore when/if that happens.

What they say actually makes sense. They first have to survive in the PL. Then, they have to put the right structure in place. Then, they have to look at revenue and try start squeezing the maximum they can. FSG did that really well with us, slowly and finally putting the club in line with modern times.

Throwing players on a pile now Football Manager style doesn’t make sense, but obviously they will need maybe 2-3 improvements immediately. They have enough time until January to assess or possibly solve the manager situation. But for that to happen, we have to see who makes that footballing decision? So we go back to structure. We’ll see who they have lined up.

Now, they should also be careful about which players to bring in. I think for now, it will be a mixture of underwhelming but realistic (maybe difficult to understand for the impatient mass public) and probably somewhat overpaid players also. Some of the names being thrown about I just don’t see them attracting/completing for now. Not only now but probably not in the first year or two of three. Then, we will see what foundations they’ve put in place and we can judge better what could be their ceiling for the next, say, 10 years or so.

It’s not the same as City (who were in a better place when the takeover happened) and not to mention Chelsea. So even if they have the richest owners (doesn’t mean everything), it could take more time with Newcastle to join that group on the pitch.

Looking more long term, I’ll be also interested if they look at the St. James’ situation with the other two much smaller stands. But I guess that one is a long way ahead, if even then. Putting the right footballing people in charge of football places to build the football structure is now the priority (could take time and obviously they will need players possibly before that is all in place), along with probably solving the training ground question.

2 Likes