Knew it.
Puzzling why so many clubs voyed against the ban though.
All those clubs are under multi-club ownership so itâs not a surprise.
Sweetingâs post here Premier League 2023/24 (Part 1) - #4622 by Sweeting
actually made most of that fairly clear. Add in Sheffield Unitedâs Saudi ownership, and the only one left to puzzle about was Burnley.
Everton voted against the ban. I wonder whatâs in it for them?
777 - the entity in the midst of purchasing them - owns Genoa, Standard Liege, Vasco de Gama and Hertha Berlin and are currently negotiating to buy Sevilla
Thanks, that would explain it.
Everton moaning and crying about the unjust of the PL and then voting in favour of multi ownership deals, and they wonder why we call them bitter.
Never thought Iâd say this but after yesterday, I now hope Utd smash them on Sunday and I hope Sheffield Utd finish a point above them in 17th due to them signing a player in Jan from Olimpiakos or whatever club theyâre affiliated with who then goes on to win them the game on the last day.
Would be fitting. Truly pathetic club.
Votes should be done out of season,
When we know who will be in the league at the start of the next season.
Sheff utd, and hopefully everton and man city might not even be in the epl next season, this is 3 clubs who voted against the ban
Burnley wants a wordâŚright now all 3 clubs in the relegation zone are votes against the ban, though I expect Everton to be out as soon as this weekend
Burnley = Kompany pep city.
I doubt that is a factor, ownership would not do their bidding, and I suspect Kompany is his own man as well. Certainly on good terms with City, but not under their thumb. I think it is more likely that ALK/Velocity have aspirations to follow a similar multi-team/league model.
I doubt that is a factor, ownership would not do their bidding, and I suspect Kompany is his own man as well. Certainly on good terms with City, but not under their thumb. I think it is more likely that ALK/Velocity have aspirations to follow a similar multi-team/league model.
Donât ruin my analysis, and be less trusting and more cynical.
Donât ruin my analysis, and be less trusting and more cynical.
Just following the moneyâŚ
I find it surprising that something like this had to go to a vote.
I find it surprising that something like this had to go to a vote.
The Premier League is effectively owned by the member clubs. While the rules of the games are governed by IFAB, how the league itself operates is dictated by itself. So how else are they going to come to a common understanding of what those rules of the competition are other than themselves voting on them?
I doubt that is a factor, ownership would not do their bidding, and I suspect Kompany is his own man as well. Certainly on good terms with City, but not under their thumb. I think it is more likely that ALK/Velocity have aspirations to follow a similar multi-team/league model.
Burnley are reportedly seeking a âtalent-shareâ agreement with Dundee. Although this is different than direct ownership at the moment perhaps they have concerns about how affiliations are accounted for.
Absolutely robbed by VAR vs PSG, I loved it.
I assumed the money transfer was quicker from Paris
Newcastle now need to beat Milan and hope Dortmund beat PSG to qualify for the knock out stages.
Fail to beat Milan and theyre out of Europe altogether. Think id rather they get stuck with a few Thursdays than have a clear run in the PL.