Epstein Abuse Ring

To me that whole behaviour thing is a side show to what was / is really happening. And her “losers” comment just highlighted the attitude that exists in that sphere. Everyone outside is scum to be extorted and used.

4 Likes

She’s talking about it from the perspective of a socialite. Where what matters is the invitations. To events where talk is typically focused on who isn’t there because they didnt get invited.

A lot of these people routinely hate each other, but trade in social capital so spend a LOT of their time in the presence of people they dont like but feel they have to be present around.

2 Likes

A bit like TAN then?

7 Likes

Yeah, when people are inclined to look down on me I play my “dont you know I am a close associate of Mr Peaches” card, and that shuts them up.

4 Likes

Who has the files?

Good article from Marina Hyde.

As Julie K Brown, the brilliant Miami Herald journalist whose watershed 2018 investigation into Epstein was built on the back of years of her meticulous reporting, stated baldly: “Epstein got away with his crimes because nearly every element of society allowed him to get away with them.”

The same for a lot of scandals. The rights of women and children not to be trafficked and abused is secondary to the way we indulge rich powerful men we deem to be useful in some way.

8 Likes

Just honest and what everyone should be saying.
For me it’s nothing but a ‘rich mans’ game club anyone in the files had their part in the club.
Rich and powerful have had such clubs since … way back.

4 Likes

Remember, the head of the FBI previously testified to congress that the case is considered closed and nothing in the files to indicate the possibility of co-conspirators

Do not listen to Julie K Brown, she is mentioned in the Epstein files significantly.

And no, my sarcasm is not a dig at any poster. There is even a little bit of truth in that sarcasm.

Its just trolling at this point.

4 Likes

Wait .. that makes me ….

1 Like

Is that what ISMF stands for?

I Share Mandelson’s Friends…? :see_no_evil_monkey:

6 Likes

So bad that he has several high class prosecutions to his name?

The problem is until 2 weeks ago no one knew what Mandleson was doing, the two cases of him having to resign (In Blair’s goverment) were rather weak to what the world has come accustomed to. He was by all accounts a very successful EU envoy.

There is a whole list of people who suggested Mandleson would be a good handle of Trump. That’s the problem here, we’ve had 4 people face the heat on this, one never met him and the other are minor figures of politics and royalty.

Meanwhile tech bros, billionaires, supreme court judges, presidents etc etc are all over those files and yet…

I do know people who know Mandleson reasonably well and he is a sly bastard but even one of them who loathed him suggested they thought it was an ok appointment all things considered.

3 Likes

https://x.com/boris_beissner/status/2020771614930210909

12 Likes

Maxwell sat for a closed door hearing with the house oversight committee and refused to answer questions about Epstein, demanding Trump grant her clemency before she did

2 Likes

Looking at it logically, it probably means she has nothing useful. Imagine the outcry if Trump say’s yes and then she delivers some generic shit that doesn’t make a difference.

I personally think she would have been dead way before her trial if she knew anything about anyone important.

4 Likes

Looking at it logically, she obviously knows all the details of what happened. Looking at it logically, there is no need to kill her as long as she keeps quiet. Killing her would be so blatant, and confirm all the suspicions about Epstein’s death, so it’s best avoided unless she’s going to spill the beans. Looking at it logically, she only has to keep silent and she’ll continue to be treated better than any other prisoner and will be released at some point soon. Looking at it logically, there is no reason at all for all this delay and obfuscation unless there is some information that powerful people want hidden.

6 Likes

looking at it logically ?

I’m not going to watch that video as I’m sure it has nothing to do with my post to you. Why post random videos instead of engaging in an intelligent and adult way?
This is a very serious topic, it deals with corruption at the highest levels of business and politics on an international scale, and it involves the trafficking and rape of countless young women.
You claim that Maxwell, the partner of the man at the centre of this scandal, doesn’t know anything important about it. When I argue against this idea, your response is to post a video. Either you have a counter argument, or you don’t, but at least engage and be honest.

4 Likes