Even with the obstruction there are still significant Trump related things in the releases.
Furthermore, these are DoJ files and Garland is, unfortunately, not like Barr. This framing gives too much credence to Trump’s expectation that every other government operates the way his does.
Trump was pining for Rush Hour 4 the other week (a Ratner franchise)
While half of Norway is still in wearing black (metaphor obviously), our brothers knows how to cheer us up. Blessed be Finns and their humour.
I have read maybe 100 or more Epstein e-mails now, most of whom I don’t feel like sharing at the moment. It’s above and beyond.
However, among all of them,some are incriminating, some are just beyond embarassing, some are totally innocent and some just interesting. This one, this one is the strangest I have read so far though:
Seems like snuff was also part of the entertainment (in some of the mails they also speak of hits with Russians)
She’s someone who got horribly treated. Likes of the sleazebag Vince McMahon etc.
Mmmm
It’s ok. It’s all over now. As you were…
I think this is more common than you think in certain social circles. Epstein kept up these conversations precisely because it allowed him to claim he was at the centre of a web of obsequious social climbing sorts; the knowledge allowed him to facilitate the trade of favours, further establishing his connections and reamplifying his ‘importance’ in their eyes and why he was fawned over.
Is there any crossover between the Epstein abuse and the Weinstein abuse?
He hopes it is,and so does his heroic boss!
Not heard of anything linking the 2, but hearing some of the details emerging, nothing would surprise me
Obviously snuff type content, and obviously not created directly by him or else it would have been the first or second charge. Not sure what the law is in the USA, surely even having the content is illegal? (assuming it’s real and not acted)
This is the problem with the release without context as some people purposely post this shit in order to create a following for themselves. Standing on the backs of victims for personal gain.
The shock. The horror. The outrage.
People finally finding out that politicians the world over are a bunch of self serving bastatds.
It is not obvious.
You only charge someone of something you think you can prove.
But of course, I agree on the point about context.
Yeah, I sort of made an assumption that he would have been charged with it even if they couldn’t prove it. So maybe 99% not created directly by him, I think anything less than that they would have charged him.
