FIFA World Cup 2026 - USA/Canada/Mexico (Part 1)

Us coverage asks mark clattenberg to explain the ref considerations for judging if the pitch is playable after rain like this. He speaks for 4 mins and says nothing remotely close to answering the question.

These ref experts add less than nothing to,the coverage

2 Likes

Come on Senegal!!!

4 Likes

Jaaaaaaaaaa

Wait…

Sigh

Jackson…dude

1 Like

Unfortunate injury that…

Really struggling with precision. Grumbles

Watching both matches at the same time… TV and Laptop

1 Like

every time i start thinking senegal has a chance at winning a game, i look at who they have as forwards (Sarr and Jackson), and know they are cooked

how can you say norway has been the better team, like HOW??

1 Like

So extremely long, these so called hydration breaks. How they can last longer than 1 min is beyond me; except it is not. US televison, grrr.

Such a capitulation by FIFA, and such a dishonest argumentation (which is worse than just calling it commercial breaks).

1 Like

First 5mins they were good and had Senegal pinned back, otherwise Senegal have slowly taken over and especially since the sub.

2 Likes

Not yet. Senegal has been the better team overall. Norway is full of rust.

Wasnt paid enough I guess.

surprised muphy said norway has been better

1 Like

and right on que there goes wild man jackson

Ok. I watch it on Norwegian TV, so don’t know anything about that.

1 Like

Commentary talked about the Iraq team of a fractured country and players from different regions, playing together as a team, being together going forward.

1 Like

Pisses me off how absolutely beyond amazing this team was in the qualifiers and how good these players are and can be; but some how now it is very problematic to pass some what precisely.

It is extremely frustrating because I have seen this team being so wonderfully amazing.

Don’t think I’ve ever seen Haaland have more than 10 touches of the ball in any match.