Harvey Elliott (M/AM) to Villa, apparently (initial loan)

PSR compliance, Villa really struggle with over 90% of their revenue going on wages so in January and again this window they are loaning players in rather than permanent deals

3 Likes

100% agree with the above, and would add that doing them a solid now will help smooth a potential future move for Rogers. Arguably the outline of that future deal has already been agreed.

1 Like

They’re skint

2 Likes

Yep PSR. Cost into next year.

2 Likes

and would image a loan fee of 5-10m… to add to the £35m. Plus no wages this year.

3 Likes

Loan to Elliot means that he can’t play against his parent club while still being able to play against other clubs.

Strengthening Villa might mean our rivals take a hit too. Emery is a very good manager

2 Likes

This is the thing Villa fans get pissy about they aren’t skint. The rules hogtie them.

And the shit result/ umpiring last game of the previous season.

1 Like

Story of my life - hogtied by rules :frowning:

Anyway, good luck Harvey. You will never walk alone!

7 Likes

Rogers in the coming months

More chance of Brendan

Where, if Wirtz fails or Szoboszlai becomes a RB?

:joy:

1 Like

Long term Salah replacement maybe?

In the coming months the window will be closed.

You can negotiate for a Jan transfer, like we did for Virgil

1 Like

1 Like

So did this happen or what?

I think we’re doing Villa a massive favour by giving them the player now, but allowing them to delay the fee until next year. I think the reason we have done that favour is because we expect it to be reciprocated.

6 Likes

That would be a bit naïve tbh. Recent events have just underlined that you can’t trust anyone in this business.

1 Like