Theyve just agreed £50m fee for Lavia…
boehly has really put us in our place, i doubt we’ll ever go after a player that they also want ever again.
Tyler Adams says
Very well then. IF true, then it opens up the way for Caicedo to LFC.
But as said in the other thread, you shouldn’t give so much credit to these twitter nobodies.
1 Like
I really do hope we have another option.
They are getting both
Lol… glad atleast she likes us and wants to sign. Can she play CDM?? Sign her !!
https://twitter.com/sachatavolieri/status/1690068687053570048?t=rl2bwUBGN5WO7kACfIIPXA&s=19
Lavia is gone by the look of things. Miss him.
they can’t be attractive options because you wouldn’t bid £110m for Caicedo otherwise.
1 Like
dick measuring contest this…its like watching billions or succession only in the real world
This whole episode feels like the film Burn After Reading.
No one, not the players, the clubs, has any clue what is going on but we’re all just moving in a direction we hope is forward (and Bohley is down stairs trying to finish his dildo chair) so imagine trying to report on this as an honest reporter
Chelsea want both players. Signing Lavia first just puts them in pole position to get Caicedo as well because the lad wants to go there…
I was trying look for a positive.
With us agreeing a fee for Caicedo and not far off Lavia, is anyone optimistic enough to suggest that an ultimate Dudek/Kirkland situation is going to reoccur?
If it was Edwards I wouldn’t have worried much. We look like United after signing Szab and Macca - no clear targets. Just shooting at obvious names.
1 Like
As of today ‘club agreed terms with player’ means shit.
2 Likes
We will miss on both unless Lavia stays firm and we match the 50 million valuation.
It appears to me Chelsea want everyone!!
I can see us missing out on both Caicedo and Lavia,
from the morning highs, we are now at a low in the evening,
1 Like
It has been suggested that Chelsea are restricted by FFP so one or the other. Chelsea like all teams can only field 11 players.