i think thats the issue Chelsea have. Our offer is meant to be excellent in terms of upfront fees, sell on clause and not so many add ons
1 Like
I would say the most comical tweet I read was not sure from which journo but it was like "A “X” team is preparing to receive a bid for their player " – lol other than switching your fax or switching on data in mobile not sure how u prepare to receive a bid. Lol.
1 Like
All the tweets do same to have the same feel to them please drop out because we are bidding more.
Since the platform is no longer called twitter,why are the messages still called tweets?
By the time they offer Brighton the money, he’d have played 3 season for us and moved to real for £200 million by the looks …
Whilst fabrizio is still tweeting " Chelsea are preparing £110 million bid"
Because Elon Musk is a numpty and didn’t think that bit through.
£111m is an odd amount. LFC must know Chelsea cannot get over that amount without ffp implications.
That’s weird, I was thinking exactly the same thing. Are they now called X’s?
I must admit ive been wondering exactly same 110 to 111 isn’t a deal breaker in normal circumstances so its rather strange amount.
1 Like
Could be,he’s let a lot go since he took over
Just not at the same time
Don’t know whether @SBYM agrees to that
chelsea just loaned Kepa to Real…they need another keeper now…more money they dont have
once, i had a wank when i had a poo…didnt know whether I was coming or going…
They probably save on the money now.
this is chelseas issue - they arent making a profit on the sale of their players = hence their ffp issues
Kepa’s earning good money. Guess they need every bit of money to make a bid for Caicedo.
Unless they are claiming Madrid are paying a 100m loan fee going on the rumours its no use because it doesn’t effect the profit and loss.
Kepa’s on 250k a week i think. That’s a sizable chunk that can be added to the profit and loss over a year. 12M
Its based on transfrer dealings