Most disliked pundit

Are you in the minority or majority :grin:

There is a reason why this thread exists and there isnā€™t a most liked pundit.

99% are absolutely dross, the best ones Iā€™ve come across have actually been journalists. They would also be awful referees but that wouldnā€™t change much.

Goldbridge a YouTube ranter has made far more sense than most punditry on television regarding our goal on Saturday.

5 Likes

https://x.com/AndyCantwell/status/1733135450372550904?s=20

The guy just digs deeper what a bellend.

If only I had thrown apples at a wall.

https://x.com/AccidentalP/status/1733802427013349778?s=20

1 Like

someone make him stop :see_no_evil:

Neil Lennon.
Iā€™d never tire of punching that objectionable little fat ginger twat

1 Like

I mean calling Endo ā€˜the japanese boyā€™ just sort of says it all and thatā€™s not even the main part of it!

2 Likes

Ian Wright will step down as a pundit from Match of the Day at the end of the season after over 25 years on the programme.

I like Ian Wright. Always thought he talked sense and I respected his take on thingsā€¦

6 Likes

Likeable fella, but really, thereā€™s not enough quality football stuff coming from him. Itā€™s pretty ordinary and weak, sounds more like some of us mortals the pub rather than an ex-footballer from the highest level. I sense heā€™s been more like a Micah Richards type of figure (put him together with Roy Keane and there you have it - different characters). Saw lately that when it comes to some deeper football talk, he doesnā€™t say much.

1 Like

what does that tell you?

either;

  1. hes was just an athlete that could kick a ball and didnt really ā€˜clickā€™ with the tactical side of the game

or

  1. maybe some of the over analysis is just speaking for speakings sakeā€¦football being a reasonably simple game played by people who spent hours practicing technique and (traditionally) not working on self improvement outside of their own physical conditionā€¦meaning you dont have to be stupid to play football, but if you are it wont hinder youā€¦

maybe us plebs want to think the game is more complex than it is at that top level as some kind of mitigating factor to why we ourselves ā€˜didnt make itā€™

1 Like

Nail on head.
The game is over analysed to death these days.
Not sure whatā€™s worse, tiresome pundits or deluded supporters

Yup the leaps are in fitness not in the game itself.

Iā€™d rather keep him and move some of the others on :rofl:

1 Like

Definitely. Give me Wright over Richards any day of the week.

2 Likes

I think it is a sport that can be more complex than a lot of players/ coaches will admit too, and where lots of players/ coaches thrive without having a really deep understanding of the game (as can be witnessed by their comments).

The criticism from many fans is largely aimed towards those who lack that deeper understanding but refuse to acknowledge that fact and also often appear to make no attempt to learn the actual rules.

1 Like

Maybe thatā€™s overthinking?

Thereā€™s different levels eveywhere, among us mortals in the street/pub and among (ex)professionals or simply people in media.

Game is simple, but itā€™s not really like thereā€™s nothing to talk about or explain better. Sure we can all say thereā€™s 22 people with a tiny ball on a massive pitch and who scores more wins. But football is actually a sport where there actually is lots to talk about.

Itā€™s a very free sport, even a bit stupid (objectivelly saying, because I love it, but understand it if some find it boring), but itā€™s also a big reason why itā€™s beautiful and so popular. For so many actions or sequences on the pitch you could have 10 people with 10 different views.

Itā€™s more often that I see shit punditry thatā€™s almost like pub talk (but theyā€™re getting paid for it), rather than people who know more, but overanalyze. Can happen, but I think itā€™s pretty easy to see when itā€™s really good (MNF stuff, etc.). If some donā€™t understand or donā€™t want to, thatā€™s also absolutely fine. Thereā€™s what weā€™re served and thereā€™s also us, the audience.

Wright is not a shit pundit, but for what heā€™s there first and foremost (talking football), compared to others heā€™s often surrounded with, he comes short in my opinion (and not the only one). I understand heā€™s a guy with many interests, maybe he doesnā€™t follow football as much as someone like Carra.

I also understand theyā€™re trying to match different characters to make it interesting almost from a Big Brother point of view. Put a ā€œKeaneā€ alongside a ā€œMicahā€. See how it goes, regardless of their football talk.

Most of us like Wright, perhaps heā€™d be better in those 1v1 interviews rather than come on shows where they have the time to go into deeper detail.

1 Like

Football is fascinating largely because it can played at a fairly good level between teams with a huge gulf in the complexity of their approaches. On one side you can have a team whose tactics and approach are incredibly basic and not too dissimilar to the level of tactical understanding that could be employed by the guy down the pub. And on the side you have professorial types.

I think football is boring if everyone plays the same way, but have a bias towards a bit more complexity in approaches and think it is backed up pretty well by data to say that there is a ceiling to how how a team can go without employing some level of tactical complexity above ā€œman down the pubā€ to their approach.

2 Likes

What you currently have is a bunch of snide cnuts making excuses for teams without them because they once played for them or the other team is a hated rival.

Wright has never particularly been like that domestically though was a bit of a dick on internationals.

Like who is demonstrating really top notch analysis? Best Iā€™ve seen is the European journalists on BT Sport a while back. La Liga TV isnā€™t bad but theyā€™ve turned that into a game almost at times.

1 Like

???

Garth Crooks bizarrely picks Manchester United pair in Team of the Week as Liverpool point made

Story by Tom Cavilla ā€¢ 44m

image

BBC pundit Garth Crooks has surprisingly included two Manchester United players in his latest Premier League Team of the Week.

Crooks, known for his controversial takes, opted to include Andre Onana in goal and Diogo Dalot in the defensive department. Such choices have come as a surprise given the lacklustre nature of Unitedā€™s performance at Anfield, during which Erik ten Hagā€™s side did not appear impressive at either end of the pitch.

Onana was guilty of kicking the ball out of play a number of times, under no pressure from Liverpool on certain occasions, and was only called on to make one save of note after tipping over a goalbound Virgil van Dijk header.

Offering his rationale behind selecting the Cameroonian shot-stopper, Crooks said "As far as goalkeepers are concerned, I donā€™t rate the Cameroon international very highly at all.

1 Like