It’s not an argument to request a poster explain what he actually means when he says that taking swearing at refs out of the game distances it from the working class.
And gets called a twat for it. He who throws the first insult has lost.
Yup.
You know, time has moved on so it might be a good idea to put an end to this supposed post-match discussion.
1 Like
You were making a twat of yourself.
You are not such all the time.
Keep on the misinterpretation of what I am saying.
And give yourself a trophy if you like.
Out of respect for others
I am finished this discussion with you.
But the issue is not that Virgil was overheard swearing on the broadcast, is it? Surely we can agree that there is a difference between swearing in general versus berating someone in an abusive manner in particular?
No, I was pointing out that you don’t have the guts to back up your post. As you demonstrably don’t. And you had to get all sweary about it. You prove my point perfectly, You don’t get this do you.
Why’s everyone so angry? That was the most enjoyable game I’ve seen in a long time! Stick a video up of Darwin’s goals and shut’er down!
9 Likes
5 Likes
Not really as it isn’t done aggresively
The blinkered started as a retort to one individual who said he that “fair minded’ fans” get on his nerves.
Great post
Wrong again it started with the use of “fair minded” getting on someones nerves but that doesn’t support your case, you are digging a big hole and which I posted out to in a reply well before this post.
Definitely blinkered now
Of course.
But in any heated situation people may swear.
Its not the crime of the century.
My point originally related to a call for a longer ban for Virgil if he swore at the ref.
Blinkered works in both directions then.
You are as blinkered in your stance perhaps.
Proved wrong on what started and why blinkered was mentioned, but no acknowledgement tut tut
You took umbrage at being called “fair minded”
And retorted by calling a group of posters “blinkered”.
The irony!
1 Like
