Hahahah !!!
Fucking right as well.
1 Like
Yep…indeedi
1 Like
wooohoooooo that´s hilarious
while Diaz didnt touch the ball i just cant stand that rule. He may not have touched the ball but no way that gets put in if he isnt there
6 Likes
Technically we still haven’t?
It would have been a giant offside. I thought it was, lol
1 Like
1-0 Chelsea
Sterling
What a stupid rule.
They give us these goals in the piss easy games.
7 Likes
To be honest, I think it is offside.
3 Likes
Not sure on that. I’d be heartily pissed off if that was against us. I’ll still take it, mind.
2 Likes
Rodgers is finished.
1 Like
exactly was about to say the same
1 Like
New tactics – make sure Mo doesn’t score, so he keeps hungry and means we cannot ease off.
Just what we needed today….
1 Like
3 min and 6 min
28 min and 31 min
45 min and 46 min
We are scoring in pairs
2 Likes
Our record league win, for those who think football started in 1992
They’ve given it because we are 5 up already, so they can say there is no bias. Had it been 0-0, that would be chalked off.
Tin foil hat
3 Likes
Silly rule, our player intervened and made their job harder. Imo, it should have been an offside, but I’ll take it I guess. I don’t really, really like it if I was trying to be objective though
1 Like
