Or, as we see 10-15 times a season, ref’s are completely ok with letting keepers maim attackers.
If you understand how VAR is used in incidents like these, and fuck me how can we still be misunderstanding that after this long, the fact it did not overturn the decision tells us that the ref knows the contact happened as the VAR pictures showed it to. The issue is he simply thinks keepers are allowed to do that.
IF the ref’s view was the contact was with his torso and the VAR showed a kick, then that is an objective discrepancy that it can then tell the ref he should review on the monitor. it CANNOT be used to just tell him that VAR think he made the wrong decisions and should give himself another look on the monitor to rethink it.
1 Like
Put Hoddle in a rest home ffs.
5 Likes
Their goalie Sanchez…he looks like a narco
So what was the point in VAR reviewing it?
jus because u take a throw too quickly dont mean the ball is yours fool
Mike Scouse Dean upsetting the natives 
Garth Crooks will be next.
We may have to get you sectioned.
1 Like
Brighton are snide little cunts, shove on VVD, cucurella taking that throw when it wasn’t his throw. Nothing from the ref
1 Like
Is he the country singer? Who gives a fuck what he says?
Our defending of corners is back to elite levels, rarely do we allow them anything.
4 Likes
That shade & light is pretty awful for the viewers.
I wish BT Sports would knock the auto exposure off the camera and balance it correctly 
1 Like
I do!!!
I didn’t waste all those posts in the shit pundit thread for nothing!!!
3 Likes
Presumably there is a level of contact the ref would view as red card worthy. Probably contact with the head. Turns out that whatever the arbitrary line the ref thinks is consistent with what the images showed happened.
That was nasty from Maupay, he needs a slap.
5 Likes
When did Brighton collected so many cunts?
6 Likes
maupay has always been a mothafucker
2 Likes