Should TAN ban X?

Nothing weird about Susanna Hoffs mate!

4 Likes

I would take the reverse veiw.

I would ban transfer rumours from twitter as 99.99% of them are chancers just looking for attention.

@Magnus’ use of twitter highlighting the warcrimes committed by Russia following their invasion of Ukraine is something that no other social media platform as successfully managed to replicate. I have lernt so much from his posts in that thread, but looking through the bullshit that gets posted on twatter transfer rumours thread makes me feel like I am getting dumber and dumber each time I visit the thread.

3 Likes

I disagree slightly. Starving still takes a long time. Best option is simply to kill it with fire.

1 Like

Exactly, it can be used by propagandists from both sides… Which defines the modern information space as nothing more than a venal battleground for imbeciles.

I see RAWK are now using XCancel, which means you can view posts without ever having to visit X or login, because of Musk and the state of the platform. Just wondering if that could be an alternative way of still using it without the platform getting any of the benefits? Not sure how it would impact the website wise in terms of loading.

1 Like

While trying to research XCancel, I found this: Elon Musk Keeps Spreading a Very Specific Kind of Racism – Mother Jones

2 Likes

Scientific racism is nothing new. It’s just that today it is completely disprovable.

Do any reading on the background of any of the early work in genetics or statistics and you see one motivation - the search for the validation of theories on the white man’s supremacy.

2 Likes

No, but having someone so prominent blast it on a platform they own isn’t ideal.

2 Likes

So, I think XCancel is an instance of Nitter being used (source: looks like X/twitter(?) broke something again Ā· Issue #983 Ā· zedeus/nitter Ā· GitHub) though I am not 100% sure how reliable the instances themselves are (as in whether there are any vulnerabilities or anything that use XCancel as a honeypot for luring unsuspecting users for nefarious purposes).

1 Like

As I said up there, the only downside of using a working Nitter instance is that there’s no preview.

In worst case scenario, an instance will stop working and then we’ll need to use another. There’s always the possibility to host one ourselves (I’m willing to do it if needed).

Forcing a rewrite of every x.com / twitter.com URL in posts is easy using the following official Discourse plugin: Watched Words Reference Guide - Site Management - Discourse Meta

1 Like

Depending on how Nitter works, haven’t looked into it thoroughly, but I think we can somehow use the iframe embeds to do this? And if so, then perhaps there’s a way to spin up a custom instance that loads the minimal amount of data required to render the preview to minimise selfhosting costs?

I officially stopped understanding anything in this thread about ten posts ago.

10 Likes

Test: 1 https://xcancel.com/_pauljoyce/status/1829684285768343826/embed

1 Like

Only shows the url for me.

Using chrome on phone

Think it requires Add oEmbed Support for Tweet Embeds and Previews Ā· Issue #696 Ā· zedeus/nitter Ā· GitHub to be resolved. If I understand correctly that’s what Discourse uses for native embed, otherwise @ISMF has to do something with permissions for iframes or something like that.

So technically, it’s possible to do the following:

  • allow iframes for specific Nitter instance(s)
  • use Watch Words plugin and regex to rewrite twitter.com / x.com links into Nitter iframes.

This seems to me an acceptable compromise between banning twitter and keeping the forum loading functional for everyone.

Also not giving out more data to Melon Usk.

Over to @ISMF to shoot down this idea with very compelling arguments. :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

For reasons known to some, Musk is hated. Can’t think why. So we cancel him and his platform.

I wouldn’t because you know, freedom of speech?

2 Likes