I’ve read through the entire thing and I have no idea which entry you are referring to. What I would say is that there are a large number of entries on that list that require a huge amount of explaining.
6 figure sums for speaking engagements? I’ve heard him. He’s a dreadful public speaker with little of interest to say. Those amounts are about as likely as Manchester City’s sponsorship deals. These are payments for something else. What and by whom are of interest to the nation and, I would have thought, the security services.
I’m sure if 2 random people like us can read it, there’s a high chance there’s nothing to hide.
Similarly, it’s just as easy to access details of the 3/4 of a million pounds donated to Starmer to challenge for leader of the runner up party. Probably nothing to hide there either.
But it does have to be. He’d already fallen foul of rules requiring him to update the register of MPs’ interests within 28 days with the little episode over the loan for re-decorating No.10
This looks like a wheeze he’s dreamt up precisely to avoid that scrutiny this time around.
And we still have no idea where the money came from.
It’s fucking staggering to me that there is a lad on this thread actually arguing that the circumstances of an £800,000 loan to the Prime Minister is none of our concern.
Are there lots of people this deep in cap-doffing, forelock tugging, serfdom?
Johnson has very significant outgoings, and often struggles with cash flow.
That’s tends to be the case if your sexual incontinence has caused you have a variety of former mistresses shacked up in London Flats with your very expensive illegitimate children.