I Disagree. Respectfully!
I think we will be fine with the above group I listed, and don’t need one or two more for this season, in addition to Lavia, assuming we sign him or equivalent.
Obviously I won’t complain if we do sign one or two more midfielders, but at that point it will look like stockpiling to me, as we would have too many options and that will hinder emerging players from getting minutes and growing in importance for us with that.
I listed seven midfielders, plus Trent. If you add one or two more, that is 8-9 midfielders, plus Trent. It is too many! Especially if, like last season, we aren’t carrying as many veterans or sicknotes.
Trent is a right back. His inverted role means he will step into the midfield a lot, and be a playmaker for us. I look forward to seeing him build on his role from last year with better players.
I’m going on the assumption we play a box midfield, similar to what we saw last season towards the end, and the starting position of 433 became 3223 in possession, the press was back, and we looked miles better. Hence the asterisk for Trent.
I think we will continue with that, only now with better players, hungrier, and more athletic too.
If we end up with 8-9 midfielders, plus Trent, it is too much.
Edit
Just reread, and you were saying 1-2 more including Lavia. So we aren’t so far apart!