The Cricket Thread

Impressed with akash deep though. Not the quickest on the speed gun but his whippy wrist action makes him rather skiddy.

Hope India go in with the left armer option the next test. Prasidh likely to get dropped even if he bowled well this match. Lot depends on the surface. Lords generally has a fair bit to offer to bowlers (both spinners and pacers)

I’d drop one of washy / jadeja personally. Most likely going to be washy that the team management decides but he’s a better bowler at this point though than jadeja.

My bad. However the seam does seem to go off pretty early with the Dukes nowadays. Wasn’t the case before.

Play both in Perth for the opening test. you’ve already got 2 tests out of the pair and then you can pick and rotate them through the rest of the series and only need to play them both once more to get 7 tests out of them. So something like:

Perth: Wood & Archer
Brisbane: Archer
Adelaide: Wood
Melbourne: Wood & Archer
Sydney: Archer

The amount of rest inbetween Perth and Brisbane and Brisbane and Adelaide is 9 days between each, but 4-5 later in the series.

assuming archer doesn’t break down. I’d say you need them for Perth Brisbane and probably the day night at Adelaide (assuming that’s the schedule.

Yeah. That is the schedule but Vrisbane will the day/nighter this summer, not Adelaide

1 Like

then the first two tests atleast.. Adelaide if it isn’t a day nighter is pretty sedate.

With Brisbane being the day/night test it will be more suited to swing in early December with the humdity

Brisbane will still be the fast wicket. probably quicker under the lights. More reason for Archer/wood to play

That’s extremely optimistic.

Getting them on and off the plane without injury would be an achievement to be honest.

3 Likes

Pope averages 35 from 58 test matches. Nowhere near consistent enough for a top order batsmen at this level.

Crawley says hi!

I do agree. But are there other options in the county level ?

It’s probably better to give pope the final chance and then dump him if he doesn’t perform. No point blooding in a new guy now.

There are a number of county batsmen who’ve put up great numbers but continue to get overlooked for the hapless Crawley and inconsistent Pope. Sibley has been in great form since he last played for England and has also found ways to expand his game so he’s not just a more classical blocker. McKinney is a more attacking player who was in contention for the Zimbabwe test but his form has tailed off a little bit. Tom Haines is scoring loads of runs on Divison 1. You have the likes of Cox and Banton who’ve been around the England set up before. Rehan Ahmed has been scoring runs up the order as well and is a much better bowler than Bethell if they wanted more of an all rounder.

I wouldn’t be against them trying Bethell as the opener if they are determined to stick by Pope, he basically did that in NZ recently anyway because Crawley was so unfathomably shit in that series.

1 Like

Bethel opener? Three? Leading spinner?

Maybe he can be the next prime minister?

Most if not all teams face that problem. India with Kohli during the last 3-4 years of his test career as a peak example. Everyone knew he wasn’t cut out for tests anymore but no one could make the call of dropping him.

The point is that the ashes is literally the final call for a lot of careers. I remember Trott / Swann calling it quits mid series.

Give him more series against Zimbabwe , Pakistan and windies to get his average to the mid 40s.

Averages are just an indication of how good the batsman is but all it takes is a purple patch and playing against minnows for that average to change to a much better one.

History is full of examples such as those.

Unless people average 50 and above for a sustained period that is.

Sangakkara is one of my fav batsmen but there’s no denying his exploits against Bangladesh massively increased his average.

Just an example of how stats can be misleading.

He’d be an improvement at any of the above.

2 Likes