While I don’t disagree with your assessment in-so-far as a cash injection would enable the club to achieve a more rapid recovery both financially and on field, I question where might FSG find the necessary funds.
The RedBird investment in FSG has apparantly only provided limited funds (c. $150 million) for future investment. If these funds have been earmarked for a new acquisition, and not to provide the funds to prop up FSG’s existing portfolio, any funds FSG might choose to invest in Liverpool would have to come from increased borrowing.
If this is the case, unless FSG can obtain significantly better terms than Liverpool, FSG might as well sanction Liverpool increasing its own borrowing to the full extent of its facility.
(I hope you don’t mind but I’ve taken the liberty of replying on “The Owners” thread as it is more about FSG than about whom we might buy.)
The idea was the super league would be instead of UEFA competitions but domestic leagues would still continue as far as I understood it. The leagues saying they’d kick clubs out is a consequence of UEFA and the leagues working together to try and resist it isn’t it?
It seems that they are attracted to the US model of closed leagues being more entertainment based rather than competition based. Tons of money up for grabs, but nothin is ever really on the line except hope that your team can win a championship. The problem is the monopoly that the big pro leagues have, there’s no real competition, even when alternative leagues form, they get squeezed out. There are no more Cinderella stories, no more deep cup runs from minnows, etc
Why would they? Its UEFA that are losing out. The clubs would be in the super league and then UEFAS CL and EL would be vastly diminished but the clubs would still be in their league. Those leagues saying they’ll kick out the clubs that participate sounds like empty threats to me. Isn’t this a European version of what happened with the Premier League? And the Premier League are complaining about something they did to exist in the first place?
The difference here is that the Premier League agreed to stay in the pyramid and help out the lower leagues. By locking in 15 teams with no risk of relegation, you’re destroying the competitive element.
They’d still be in the Premier League/La Liga etc. it’s a replacement for the CL. Not domestic league. Hence Premier League etc. backing up UEFA with threats to kick these clubs out of their domestic leagues if it goes ahead. Hardly a threat if that’s what they were going to do is it?