For a second, I thought you were talking about bringing Ben Davies back to fill in for Gomez. I figured @Semmy has lost his mind.
Cos he wasnât good enough. Sweeting or similar can probably give us a list of players whom we let go and have subsequently become good enough for our first team - it will be a very short list
10 games in top league is good threshold for any hope
Looking at how Phillips and Williams have done with us, and how they perform when out on loan, I think thereâs also a good argument to be made that in some cases, itâs also a matter of development being better with us, or that these players just have a specific ability that makes them suited for bit-part roles but not starting week in, week out.
Maybe thereâs an alternate universe where Brewster didnât get injured, and had a first-team debut with us, going on to save us the millions we spent on NĂșñez. Or maybe not. Thereâs certainly a part of me thatâs wondering if perhaps we should have just let Awoniyi play that role, and if training and playing regularly under JĂŒrgen would have changed his career completely.
I was actually thinking of players that we let go and bought back later. We were apparently interested in Anthony Gordon after letting him go as a kid, but I canât think of any that have actually made the move back.
The one that comes to mind is Iago Aspas
Even that one you have to wonder. He has had a great career with Celta, but his best season in La Liga remains 2011/12, really the one that attracted LFC to buy him. The only season he exceeded total goals for them was 2016/17 where he scored 5 EL goals in 12 appearances.
Also, he wasnât that good on loan to Sevilla either, which really makes me wonder if heâs just a Celta Vigo man through and through.
Yeah, I suppose my point is I struggle to think of any players who weâve let go and really regretted going back way back to Beardsley and Staunton in the Souness era
Same here, we donât have the likes of Salah and De Bruyne passing through our books the way Chelsea does. There are a decent number who have gone on to have solid careers and would have been useful players, but you have to think they needed playing time they would not have gotten in order to become those players - in the match on now, Solanke comes to mind.
If not for your caveat, Iâd have said Iâve got one â PĂ©ter GulĂĄcsi considering we let him go when we brought Mignolet in.
Aspas
The Gulasci one is more down to the fact that he is a decent goalie and Mignolet was crap.
Yeah, there was the lad who played full back at West Ham (Kevin Nolan?) who we were reportedly interested in before we got Andy in but the age & price combo probably ruled that out.
Nah, no Aspas. This league and Liverpool was too much for him. Different world from his Celta.
Itâs hard to give all them players an equally good chance anyway, weâre one of the top clubs and cannot do so. Impossible.
You will always have players who move on and do better elsewhere and there wonât be an argument that we shouldâve used them more or sell them better than we did.
No idea what @redalways is complaining about
Is that a rumour or has it been confirmed by a reliable source?
Rumor that Bajcetic will cancel his current loan and switch to Real Betis. Given Grav donât have any backup, I think Slot doesnât rate him.
I gathered it wasnât really going well for him at Salzburg, and now that Linders is gone there a different loan makes sense.
Endo, as well as both Jones and Mac, provides solid cover for Gravy so it makes sense the focus for Bajcetic this year should be developing to really push for a place next summer.
It was made clear from the start that the plan for BajÄetiÄ was always to get him out on loan to get game time, which is especially vital after his injury. Itâs not about rating him or not.
He has 890 minutes so far this season, and in comparison Gravenberch has had 2101, coming from playing virtually all the time. Itâs hard to see BajÄetiÄ getting anywhere close to that amount of playing time for us no matter how highly you rate him.