The Unreliable LFC Transfer Rumours Discussion Thread (Part 3)

Leggy? If you’re gonna call me, you can call me AL.

2 Likes

4 Likes

Call it pride but I wouldn’t take back any player who left my club on a free if there was a fee involved in his return transfer.

I said it a few times before (though it’s a variation on Carra’s comments on Trent): if he really wants to pay respect to the club that made him and if he wants to know how desperately Real Madrid want him, he should sign a contract with a reasonable release clause (which, in my opinion, would be around 80 million pounds for a player of his stature), maybe one that applies only to Real Madrid. If they decide to pay it this summer, he has my blessing to leave.

But for him to leave on a free, spend some time there and then return to Liverpool for a fee… No way. That would be against the way this club is being run. It would be almost Pogba-like from Liverpool.

7 Likes

$350k a week for a RB, no matter how good he is, is too much and would see other players knocking on the door for a pay increase

5 Likes

I don’t agree fully with Carra on what he said.

They were both good for each other, Liverpool for Trent and Trent for Liverpool. We cannot say that Liverpool made (as he was a car made in factory) Trent or that Trent would’ve become the same exact Trent, let’s say, anywhere else below the top level (I think he would’ve still made a pretty good career).

Many players will come through our system. Very, very few will be of Trent’s calibre and accomplish such a story. Liverpool was and will continue being successful with a ton of new players.

There is value also in the success for a long time we had together, not only in terms of pure profit; how we paid and gained from each player. If we go only by that criteria, then football doesn’t really make sense, does it. It’s a game of many imperfections.

Sometimes transfers on a free happen due to different factors and there is not only one “guilty” party. Trent’s guilty that he’s not sacrificing more or the club’s guilty that they won’t give him what he wanted at a certain time. No, at least for me.

There is a bit of Trent’s long term ambition and also the result of Liverpool losing their organization for a while on and off the pitch. Plus, the oppurtunity (that spot being open at Real). Timing.

Should there be a new rule or something for such cases, that might be something to discuss in another thread.

I can accept that this is just what happens in football from time to time, even to the biggest clubs. We’re lucky it’s Liverpool, among the top of football’s food chain, so it rarely happens. We’re mostly on the other, better side of these deals.

9 years together is a very nice story, it doesn’t have to be 15 or whatever all the time with local players. A lot of them will get nowhere near to 9. I will remember him positively and as a club legend. So far no reasons for me to have ill feelings.

He’s still here so I won’t look too far ahead when talking about a potential return. But purely theoretically speaking, if one day it makes sense (both from a football and financial perspective) for both sides, I wouldn’t mind it.

3 Likes

:100:. Liverpool didn’t ‘make’ him take that corner quickly

5 Likes

Get him to sign a new contract, then we could send him on loan with them paying his wages and a loan fee to us😏

4 Likes

Never mind about sources, maybe I can make some shit up and go “sources say”.

Frankly jog off.

3 Likes
2 Likes

If Trent is going to be paid £348k pw at Real Madrid, arguably we could stretch ourselves and just about match it (there would be ramifications, as other deals in the squad would be increased as new benchmarks are established, and the club could ultimately find itself in trouble if not careful).

Still, let’s imagine we could match the weekly salary. Three things come to mind:

  1. Do we want to? Hughes is a hard nosed negotiator by reputation, and he likely has a value in mind for what certain players would be given, within his overall budget. Maybe we don’t want to give Trent that much?

  2. Even if we did want to, Real Madrid will be giving him a large signing bonus due to no transfer fee. Now we are getting to a place where we probably could not, or should not match it, even if we wanted to.

  3. Trent’s wishes come into it. In fact, that’s the largest part of all this, and it seems he wants to go to Real Madrid - huge club, global fan base, lots of money, sunshine, guaranteed trophies, lifestyle, try a new thing that most don’t get offered, connect with his friend Bellingham etc.

If he goes, I’m sad but mostly about not getting a fee. The rest of it I fully understand. If he has the opportunity to go and he fancies it, good luck to him. Life goes on.

6 Likes

Something like that is never completely planned, but Barca’s tendency to turn off at corners was supposedly something Krawietz identified. That was why they included even the ball boys into the plans to make sure balls would be available to restart quickly.

3 Likes

All we can really do is offer him the best contract possible within our existing structure and let him know how valued he is here.

If he decides that it isn’t enough then that’s on him.

7 Likes

Can’t see that one happening, doesn’t really seem to fit the profile of either of our right sided roles.

Yeah, Frimpong is such a lazy link.

I’m sure this would appeal to Darwin, if he still has enough confidence to play at the top level.

Atletico Madrid are on the hunt for a new striker in the summer and one of their transfer targets is Liverpool’s Uruguay striker Darwin Nunez, 25. (Caught Offside), external

Liverpool will only sell Nunez in the summer if they bring in a replacement, with Brighton’s Brazil striker Joao Pedro, 23, one name on their radar. (Teamtalk)

3 Likes

Last few snippets of Brighton’s games I have watched, I thought Rutter looked better than Pedro

1 Like

Predicted this a long time ago and somehow feel it would work out for him.

5 Likes

Agreed. Not sure they’d stump up 60-70m for him though…

(If that is even a realistic fee)

45-50m and Nunez can go happily. Yes , it will be a loss to Liverpool. But player amortization etc so come in. Plus leaves us with enough money to pay some money for Isak if not the whole thing.

Isak is good don’t get me wrong, but I am increasingly concerned about his fitness record, particularly looking at the kind of fee it would take to get him (likely £100m+).

For that kind of money you want a guy who will be available for the majority of games and can be reliably counted on when you need him.

5 Likes