…had to re check your findings…re entered everything including a few variables and you are 100% right… never wouldve guessed it though
It will be - theres only 60 hours left of the window!
Rogers would be a fantastic addition to the squad, another Man City “reject” who could reach great heights and prove himself elsewhere. That said, I don’t really see it happening this late in the window, Liverpool surely can’t spend so much additional money should Guehi and Isak deals go through - and Aston Villa certainly won’t sanction some loan with obligation to buy next summer, not with all the PSR issues they’re having. Also, Elliott is still here (I assume Rogers would be fighting it out with Wirtz over that no. 10 role - at least I think it’s his best).

25m pounds + or no deal.
I’ll be sure to let them know
Unless we plan to reinvest in someone else on top of Isak/Guehi, which is almost impossible, I’d just keep.

Yeah especially for 10m pounds or whatever Meelan likely to offer.
I bet the offer is ‘can we just have him?’

I hope it works out for him. Having AC Milan on your CV will look a helluva lot better than Crystal Palace.
Don’t know about that. At this stage in his career it’s not really about his CV. He’d be more likely to happy and fulfilled at CP in my opinion.
I was thinking post-career. Maybe I shouldn’t have referred to his CV.
When he’s dandling his grandkids on his knackered knees saying he played for LFC and Meelan, will sound a lot better than including Crystal Palace in the list of clubs he played for.
Also, Gomez is a South London boy. But I think we should keep him, just remove all trip hazards at Kirkby.
This is a joke, right? And I’m not talking about Naked Gun reference. They’ve just burned a truckload of money on a Chelsea sicknote. I think it’s fair to expect something in the region of 25-30 million pounds for him.
I do applaud the team (Hughes and Edwards) for the business they have done this summer, especially the sales, but boy, our quality depth is nonexistent, particularly compared to our rivals.

