Starmer is getting lots of shit from the âtheyâre all the sameâ crowd (a view that has been deliberately cultivated by right wing opinion formers).
But what Starmer essentially brings is competence, integrity and stability. Iâll take that with both hands after the last ten years.
Something you have to remember about Starmer and his team is that they are incredibly pragmatic. Everything the left criticises him for is out of touch with reality.
Brexit? What is the point opening that wound, when there is no prospect of Britain rejoining the EU. The EU will not consider our membership while political and public opinion is still fragmented, and even then it would inevitably be on worse terms than we had in 2015. Weâd be looking at having to adopt the Euro, more regulatory alignment, and no rebate this time. And if Le Pen gets in (god help us all) there may not even be an EU in a decade.
Spending/Taxation? I think it not acknowledged just how little scope there is for either taxing or borrowing, and how but that is going to constrain ambition. Certainly after Truss, our capacity to borrow is still really compromised. And Labour canât go into the election talking about raising taxes. Any tax rises, even for the most wealthy, get spun into a toxic issue. I think a fairer more distributive regime is on the way, but Labour have to get in power first, and need to stabilise public finances first.
Immigration? As painful as it is, and as bollocks as it is migration is still a toxic issue for lots of people, and thatâs because Governments have used migration as a means of deflecting blame from their own failings for decades (Labour arenât spotless on this). Labour have to give the impression of toughness while getting on with a fair system.
I donât know how you go about combatting the cynicism that the last 14 years have fostered in public life, especially when the country is in such a state that big ambition is really difficult. But I feel very confident saying that Starmer, despite the bullshit that gets spoken about him, is more instinctively left wing than Blair. Without a doubt.
Blair was always a wolf in sheepâs clothing. Very little of the left about him. Starmer is a more traditional Labour leader, with far less scope - in finances, or public attitude, or media tolerance - to apply labour policies.