UK Politics Thread (Part 3)

Sorry mate no. The boiling piss is the clue.

ā€œIf wealth was the inevitable result of hard work and enterprise, every woman in Africa would be a millionaire.ā€ ~ George Monbiot

6 Likes

Woke lefty.

2 Likes

Very broad shoulders though. Odd that.

This is all very simple. Socialism is those who can and do should pay for those who’d frankly rather be doing fuck all.

Sounds French, probably.

Well done, you’ve figured out the analogy. It’s nothing to do with hard work

Ah yes, one of the classic RWNJ lines

I’ve got bad news for you, my friend: it’s utter bollocks.

4 Likes

Fiscally responsible my arse.

6 Likes

ā€œRepeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truthā€ - Goebbels

3 Likes

It really bugs me that the ā€œUKā€ has essentially just shrugged its shoulders and moved on with an attempted clear up.

It doesnt feel right that we just accept that previous government ministers essentially maxed out the credit cards using public money and they can just disappear into the background.

2 Likes

Fify

2 Likes

It’s not even that. We have the former Home Secretary who presided over that running for the leadership of the Conservative Party.

2 Likes

There are no penalties (other than the General Election) for being shit at running the country. However, there are rules that are meant to prevent government from having their fingers in the till. I’m pretty sure that there are plenty of contracts that have been awarded on the basis of a brown paper bag and ā€œgentlemen’sā€ agreement.

There are rules against that. Unfortunately, I don’t know how many of those are enforced post-Brexit.

2 Likes

I suppose thats my question. Is it being shit or deceitful? I’m leaning towards the latter and there’s zero comeback for that, which in my opinion is wrong.

The article linked above states that ministers repeatedly and deliberately low balled the figures.

1 Like

I think that would count as being shit. Some ministers do this deliberately because the worst thing a department can do is to underspend. The second worse is to balance the budget, because when the next spending round comes in they will see this as an indication that they don’t require more budget or can accommodate cuts.

However, this looks like they have been deliberately running the department badly (in respect to the asylum system). I’d look at who owns all those shit hotels that are being used as accomodation, because that is where the money has gone.

5 Likes

Yeah, it’s bollocks that some people are bone idle.

You understand basic maths yes? Who earns more, the person doing job X for twenty hours a week or the person doing the same job, same age etc for 40 hours a week.

Yes some people get paid a fortune for little work (posting this on a forum dedicated to a Premier League football team is a delicious irony) but in normal, work harder and get paid more.

As numerous people have already pointed out it’s not as simple as that

1 Like

Yes it is, it’s always very simple. A brain surgeon earns more per hour than a Tesco shelf stacker for bloody good reason. But you don’t get to be a brain surgeon without a colossal amount of hard work. It really isn’t rocket science. Getting yourself into a position to earn mega money ā€œcanā€ be a quirk of fate or a rich parent but more often than not it’s because the person worked their arse off.

The people who spend the money in our shop are self employed builders, painters, sparks etc. Oddly, the harder and longer they work, the more they get paid.

But being as you’re the expert, I presume you work an hour a day and live in Aruba?

1 Like

2 Likes