Mate. Brexit has been a shitshow. Itās costing the economy Ā£100bn a year. Itās worth remembering that itās been a choice of the government since 2016 to artificially protect the pound against the worst impacts of Brexit, but thatās come at the cost of the highest tax burden on record, and failing public services and a spiralling cost of living.
It is silly to suggest Brexit has been anything but a unmitigated disaster, and while individual prophecies may have been less on the mark, the bigger picture - the promise of a country where everyone feels poorer, everything costs more, and our influence on the world stage is diminished, has obviously come true.
Pretty much everything promised by leave proved to be a barefaced lie.
That isnāt what I said, is it.
For the things I donāt understand weāll enough to form an opinion on, I rely on experts. And in the run up to the referendum there was nobody worthy of the title expert advising me to vote leave. Iām talking about academics, institutions and bodies of learned opinion. If you to form your opinions on international trade from the lad who runs Whetherspoons, thatās up to you.
What do you think the result of the referendum was?
A lot of the parliamentary process led and supported by Remain MPs was about running the process through Parliament and leaving on the best terms possible.
Once the result was leave, there needed to be a process to work the best form of leaving for the country. It was notable that all the cunts promising people they could safely vote remain and it wouldnāt mean leaving the single market started gaslighting the nation that what they actually voted for was a hard leave and default to WTO rules position. Almost as if they had a hidden agenda or something.
Probably best to ignore people that canāt own their own opinions. They make nonsense arguments that āothers might sayā then demand evidence for the blatantly fucking obvious
Iāve got no dog in this race, didnāt vote because to me it was a choice between a bowl of cold spew or a shit sandwich but this argument always makes me laugh.
Truth is, especially in Great Britain (stop laughing at the back) this is true of any election as the vast majority of the electorate are pig-ignorant, uninformed fuckwits. This would have been the case at the last GE and will be the case at the next one.
Referencing a famous Monty Python cafe scene, thereās a soft burn, cold burn, deep burn, fast burn, smokey burn, heart burn, spice burn, acid burn, manganese burn, phosphorus burn, zun burn, chemical burn, Chinese burn, carpet burn, embarrassing burn, burn out, burnt toast and to top it all scorchio.
Youāre twisting my point to suit your argument, againā¦.Brexit did happen but not with standing a lot opposition from people who were doing everything to stop it. Remainers still want a second referendum. Thatās not a sign of acceptance.
You really need to understand irony and Sarcasm. Itās okay for people on this forum to call me an idiot and I suppose because their views align with yours itās not considered ignorant?
I do find it amusing that this forum has so many intelligent posters who call the general public idiots, fuckwits, fools, gullible, morons etc etc. Usually because their politics differ. Well done you big brained folks.
Mate, where have I stated Brexit has been a success? Please, quote me. If you can fair enough. So that pretty much dismisses most of this statement.
Can you please provide facts to your £100bn a year claim. Thanks.
But do you see the difference in your accusation? Yes, no one knows every thing. I respect the fact that you acknowledge this and have tried to understand, educate yourself in this area. However, you follow this up by assuming people who voted leave read a story on Google and formed their opinion from this. You are forming your argument on the fact that you have listened to experts, enough to form an educated opinion but then dismiss people opposing your view as not going to the same lengths as you to form an opinion, making there mind up on some misgivings from a breakfast menu at Wetherspoons.
Do you not see where I am coming from? I am not saying you or are wrong or right but I am willing to give you a level playing field in your right to form an opinion. I am not shooting your opinion down, dismissing it, so why do you?
You consistently move the goal posts. Fail to respond directly to my points and then have the audacity to ask me to demonstrate where things have occurred so you can investigate the claims. Technically, my points regarding the Remain statements are on the basis they have not occurred, so the onus is on you to prove they have occurred.
For simplicity, shall we deal with one issue at a time?
Letās start with an easy one. From the Left Wing Guardian, a statement made by George Osbourne.
āIn the long term, the country and the people in the country are going to be poorer. That affects the value of peopleās homes and the Treasury analysis shows that there would be a hit to the value of peopleās homes by at least 10% and up to 18%.ā